To be fair, if Hillary had used top secret material to get into a woman’s pants, she probably should be charged with something.
It’s also fair game to ask the Donald about ANY/ALL of his business dealings if he doesn’t want to talk about them.
Also, when the fuck will he release his tax returns?
When they finally show he’s a billionaire.
Of course it’s fair game to use FBI comments. No one would suggest otherwise. His point was to draw a contrast with Trump’s response, which as usual was totally nuts. That’s what the headline should be.
So… never?
she would have been charged and possibly executed too in Trump Land. #mericuh
basically
Ax knows that the more they do, the more they, look like this:
Can’t stand Axelrod. He still thinks it’s 2008 and he’s running against Clinton. His glory days.
lost in the mail. probably accidently misaddressed.
what did he get wrong?
The Beltway needs more Axelrods.
I agree. I think it was a fair statement.
It is also safe to say that if Trump was subject to the same scrutiny by the personnel security investigators that the rest of us get, he would not be able to get a security clearance due to his bankruptcies and foreign financial entanglements. He’d be considered a security risk.
Of course it’s ‘fair game’…when even gross BS is commonplace among the pundit ranks why would any person think otherwise?
To say nothing of his KGB father-in-law…