Discussion: Alleged Killer And Enraged Judge Go Off The Rails In Insanely Vulgar Hearing

That was breathtakingly insane.

The craziest and most funniest thing I ever heard from a court.Can’t stop laughing at the insanity.

A couple of serious questions: Doesn’t his statement that counsel is inadequately representing him merit review at least? And also, doesn’t it seem that the defendant’s actions are intended to bait the court into just this sort of reaction to make the case more about the court’s authority than the crime?

2 Likes

The hair, yes! It’s a strange and disturbing combination of Donald tRump and Bernie Sanders…:scream:

1 Like

The judge clearly starts off rational and then lets his temper get the better of him. If I’m reading the first part of the transcript right the alleged killer got a (mental?) diagnoses from the central hospital, whereupon the judge decides to treat this obviously deranged man like any other ordinary, rational, being. Our judiciary being judicial, apparently.

1 Like

Omg :joy:

1 Like

The only comment needed…

2 Likes

I’m sure I wouldn’t have been able- I’d be laughing too hard at him! :smiling_imp:

1 Like

waste of a good needle.

he’s not going to likely be PM

he messed up on this and he would threaten their majority.

1 Like

Fuckman ass cracker.

I’m going to use that one.

are you sure?

again he was sacked, because Allen thought that he was his best opportunity to be Perry Mason.


Judge Bryant Durham cautioned him against representing himself, telling Allen he would probably be convicted if he went to trial. The proceedings only went far, far downhill from there.


As for him possibly getting a needle or life


I agree with you on that. Right now, I want to read that article that has Loki meeting Taylor Swift’s mother. The heck with civic duty…

‘god i don’t want to read this transcript…’

this guy is no dummy, nuts as he may be. what he did, by causing the judge to go clearly bonkers in the courtroom, was to create a clear case for recusement of said judge. if the judge doesn’t recuse himself, the trial itself will be a complete waste of time and money, because of the automatic grounds for a mistrial this idiot judge created with his actions in open court. any first year law student should have a field day with this.

Either the real life defendant or the court reporter saw the movie “Secret In Their Eyes” where Nicole Kidman plays a DA who manipulates a young killer named Marzin with an uncanny blonde haired wild-eyed resemblance to Allen.

The movie character got turned on by Kidman and started going off about his penis size describing himself as either donkey dick or hung like a horse while whipping it out in front of Ms. DA. The camera didn’t show Mr Marsupian in action of course and your man Allen hopefully stopped short of doing same in front of Judge Dread.

A convoluted movie that had a weird effect on one woman in the audience who pushed past me without saying a word to get to the ladies room mimicking a character in the movie who did the exact same thing at a Dodger game. Life imitating art.

To borrow from Lawyers Guns & Money, shitisfucked-up andbullshit.

Judge: One more word from you…
Allen: fuck you…
Judge: and it’s ten more days…
Allen: oral sex on you…
Judge: ten more years. Dismissed.

Murder case is thrown out but defendant has to serve life for demonic propositioning an officer of the court or whatever the judge is called.

Nerves of steel.

Yes, they can. They order a psych evaluation and if it’s determine that he is not capable of defending himself, counsel is provided for him.

Yeah the guy was a prick but I can’t believe the judge told him “you look like a queer”, or that he’d only have a chance of going free if he sucked the dick of every jury member. Remind me to never do anything illegal in the South, ever.