Discussion for article #238490
Someone take the flag and deliver it to him with the instructions to shove it where the sun does not shine.
I believe this is whatâs called a ânuisance suit.â
Frivolous. Sanction, suspend or disbar him.
In A MOve that WOULD MAKe attICUS FINch proud, FearLEss LAwYEr SUEs PC LIBtardS in HEAvLY LIbtard ALABAMA foR DEsecRATING sYMBOL of SOUthern PRIDe and StatES riGHTs (Most DEfiNITely NOT RacIST). EF U LIBtard ReverSE raCISt LIBTARd ELItes ANT-states RIGHts HAterS OF HEriTAGE!11!!!one!1!!!
Must be a child of Orly Taitz to be such a staunch defender of the flag of traitors.
All he will accomplish will be the codification of the removal⌠assuming it actually reaches the point of a genuine legal proceeding.
Imagine that, an attorney who doesnât know what âstandingâ is - or more to the point, isnât. And in Alabama, no less.
Someone should alert the Birmingham School of Law, because, after Melvinâs case is tossed out, he will have to find some other party liable for his stupidity.
I am a lawyer, and the gist of this lawsuitâusing the courts to get a racist flag flownâembarrasses even me.
Sounds like Alabama could use some tort reform of their own.
That fucking flag.
Why do I get the feeling this Melvin Hasting would be a good character in John Grisham novel?
âHastingâs suit also alleged that the Alabama Historical Commission abandoned its duty to âpromote and increase knowledge and understanding of the history of this State,â per state code.â
You know, increase knowledge that Alabama is former slaving holding, racist, backwater state . . .
Yeah, letâs renew racism in Alabama! Yahoo!!
This lawyer might be shooting himself in the foot. The state bar associations donât typically take kindly to frivolous lawsuits. Iâm not familiar with the codes for Alabama but theyâre typically similar state-to-state. I know the Florida bar will lay the smack down for lawyers abusing the system. Unless there really is a legal issue that he is justifying this on⌠ignorance of the law is no defense, as usual.
I wonder what Alabamaâs rules on standing have to offer. And is this âsuitâ for declaratory relief, or are they seeking mandamus? A nice situation for a first year civil procedure discussion, but WTF is the litigant thinking?
That this is some really cheap marketing to a substantial segment of the market.
If I had to venture a guess as to the litigantâs thought process, Iâd wager it would be something along the lines of: âI do not like black people and want the state government to reinforce my hatred.â
Iâll grant youâre probably correct, but Iâm not sure how that can be construed as a product of thought.