The headline doesn’t fit the article. By my reading, the actress is not suing, her former lawyer is.
Who believes the serial rapist, predator, deviant, denier?
Weinstein is cooked like fried chicken and his passport should be confiscated along with his bank accounts.
The rest of the condemnation will fall into place accordingly.
Well I think we knew that there would be more law suits , counter suits, and is there a name for tag-a-long suits which is what this seems to be.
You’re right.
I can see him making an ethical complaint, but how does he sue if the actress isn’t his client?
Tortious interference with a contract?
Can’t wait for the Red Carpet Vanity Victim Parade tonight. So much black, so much skin, so little justice!
Which self-aggrandizement spectacle is tonite? There are so many I can’t keep them straight.
He has to prove intent for tortious interference. How does he do that? Weinstein’s lawyer and the prosecutor don’t like the lawyer?
Golden Globes man! Jeez, I can’t hangout with you anymore if you keep asking embarrassing questions. We’ll never be invited anywhere.
Yes.
Plus tortious interference with a prospective economic advantage (in case court finds there was no contract to be interfered with).
Plus one other cause I can’t recall just at the moment.
Hey, that’s part of the question mark. I did not mean to suggest he could win.