Discussion: 61 Senators Sign Letter In Support Of Keeping Legislative Filibuster Rules

3 Likes

“We are mindful of the unique role the Senate plays in the legislative process, and we are steadfastly committed to ensuring that this great American institution continues to serve as the world’s greatest deliberative body,”

Give me a fucking break, peddle this chauvanistic fantasy to someone who’s gullible enough to believe it – Chris Cillizza or Chris Matthews would be a good first choice.

42 Likes

I call horseshit. The Republicans will drop the legislative filibuster as soon as it becomes convenient for them. And they’ll blame it on gridlock and intransigence by Democrats.

32 Likes

Yes, in the interests of comity, and the great tradition of bipartisan blah blah blah etc. and so on, they should keep the legislative filibuster in place.

Until such time as the Democrats are in control again, and then fuck 'em.

18 Likes

Puhleeeze…that train has left the station. It seems they always support the 60-vote rule except when they don’t. Filibusters…at least the form used by Republicans to great effect…are now history. If you voted for cloture and allowed Gorsuch to be confirmed with 51 votes, I’m sorry, as my mother would say, you’ve made your bed, now sleep in it. Such hypocrisy is hard to fathom.

20 Likes

Oooooo - they signed a “letter!” Too late now, you chickenshits. Our SCOTUS is fucked for 30 years thanks to you cowardly assholes. Don’t even start talking about the world’s greatest deliberative body and blah blah blah. You’re useless pimples on the ass of history.

25 Likes

It’s easy enough for Rs to be for the legislative filibuster. They want the power to ram judges they want onto the courts, but they don’t actually want to be able to pass legislation. Their judges have done plenty of things they like in the past twenty years, but the Rs didn’t do much with the legislative trifecta last time they had it. Their goal is to hobble the federal govt, and it’s much safer to let Federalist Society ideologues on the courts dismantle the govt than take responsibility for killing it themselves.

If you’re a “moderate” Senate R, you do have this further problem, that idiots in your own party in the House might screw the pooch and actually pass legislation to do what is better left to the courts. That makes the legislative veto not just harmless to your side if you’re an R, it makes it a positive good. You can still vote for legislation that you know to be stupid because if you don’t you’ll be primaried by the crazies in your party, but you are rescued from the consequences of the stupid legislation itself by Ds who will filibuster the thing.

Whatever non-disreputable function the filibuster might have played in one or two examples you can cite from history, it serves no other basic function except as a way to dodge responsibility. For a long stretch it was the way the D majority avoided their responsibility to end Jim Crow. Since we handed the segregationist franchise over to the Rs, it has consistently been against us. No D should have signed this letter. All Ds should be for ending the filibuster, period.

10 Likes

The horse is out of the barn.

Side -bar

“Donald Trump personally profited from missile-maker Raytheon’s stock jump after his Syria attack”

14 Likes

Between 1955 and 1961, when Lyndon Johnson was Senate Marjority Leader, the Republicans filibustered two bills.

Between 2009 and 2015, when Harry Reid was Senate Majority Leader, the Republicans filibustered 419 bills.

I don’t think for a minute that Mitch McConnell will accept that sort of obstruction from the Democrats, assuming that they’re even up to offering it.

I think that when there’s a bill on the table that the Republicans really want to pass, they’ll nuke the filibuster for good.

16 Likes

Sometimes… there’s a smell that ya just…can’t …get out …

Thy name is McConnell —

15 Likes

What the hell was even the purpose of this ridiculous letter? So the “moderate Republicans” can feel better about themselves while they take another brick out of the wall from the fabric of American government?

Why the hell would Dems even sign on to such a meaningless POS?

They just finished stealing your G-damn SCOTUS seat…act like you f’n care!

31 Likes

Legislative filibuster helpful to avoid needing to in an up/down vote have to decide if some really bad bill that got approval of the Freedom Caucus etc. should be law.

Judges and appointees different. Senate has special duty there so hard to pass the buck and/or resist opposition from their radical base. And, overall, they don’t really care about appointments probably & if a few stray senators doesn’t like one, can block them with Democratic support.

Bottom line, Gorsuch was basic Senate duty on the line and the Susan Collins of the Senate FAILED. I’m sick and tired of certain liberal sorts [who on some things are sane] woefully commenting on how Democrats made a mistake since they might be able to rely on these people [later on]. Susan Collins et. al. knew what blocking Garland and a few years back three judges in the DC Circuit etc. would lead to. Didn’t give a shit.

6 Likes

If this isn’t the most disingenuous,ineffective,constituent non friendly bunch of fucking poseur in Congressional history, I don’t want to know who is …disgraceful manipulating poseurs.

14 Likes

WHY!? This letter is just pandering to the masses and a mea culpa! You assholes will just change the rules to suit the majority no matter which party is in control. We just became governed by a parliament. It won’t be long before students will be learning to speak in tongues as a language. And handling snakes as an after school elective. If they have the stupidity to promote “clean coal”, they will do anything stupid.

7 Likes

So much hand washing…I hope they don’t slip on the wet marble.

8 Likes

And the reality is, even so-called moderate Republicans will go along with their party when (not if) they do away with the legislative filibuster. Then come out with mealy mouthed platitudes that they felt it more necessary to stand with their party instead of the nation (or worse, state that the Democrats ‘forced’ them to do it).

6 Likes

No, they won’t. They do not want to be backed into a corner where they’re forced to pass, or vote down, every batshit idea that comes to the mind of the Freedom Caucus and that Paul Ryan is too chickenshit to kill. And now with PP in office and ready to sign anything, they’re even less likely to do it. Republican senators know good and damn well that if half the stuff they propose ever became law, their asses would be run up out of Washington on a rail. They’re evil, not stupid. Although many are both.

13 Likes

Wouldn’t it be great to “change the rules” to elect President Clinton with “a simple majority vote”?

And eliminate the “obstructionism”, “tyranny of the minority”, and “arcane rules” of the Electoral College?

Talk about a “nuclear option”…

21 Likes

A minimum of 10 million likes for this comment.

14 Likes

I’d like to believe that you’re right, but when you look at the things that they’ve gone out of their way try to pass, they just might be that crazy and willing to weather any of the literal shitstorm that would ensue afterwards.

I could easily see them get rid of it to completely dismantle the ACA, to wipe out Medicare and Medicaid, and completely privatize SS. This is one of the biggest reasons I expect them to go back on their words as soon as it’s viable. They just don’t care about the fallout, and when you see how well they’ve been doing in the past, I can see why they don’t care.

5 Likes