Discussion for article #243185
I hope they enjoy their Thanksgivings and Christmases in jail and then in prison for the next 25 years; where they deserve to be, alongside so many black lives, (and some of those black lives should not be there.)
âThe newspaper reported earlier Tuesday that authorities were weighing whether to treat the shooting as a hate crime, citing anonymous sources familiar with the investigation.â
Sounds pretty textbook to me.
authorities were weighing whether to treat the shooting as a hate crime,
Obviously it shouldâve treated a a hate crime⌠What other reason is there?
Unless all of the protest is in these guys front yard or something that drove them crazy, this is a hate crime. The protest is largely about race.
I could see weighing whether to add to the charges, as proving it is a different story, but it clearly should be treated a a hate crime, and investigations should be seeking evidence (besides obvious common sense) to make the charge stick.
terrorists:
Well, itâs confusing when theyâre white, have been hanging around casing the protest group, and came to the scene together each armed, guns loaded for fire, and them wearing protective vests and masks.
Like, if they REALLY went there jointly with menace on their minds, youâd think theyâd make some effort to avoid it been so OBVIOUS, right? Itâs SO obvious, so right-out-of-the-Code textbook, you just have to be suspicious they might be all just jointly too stupid to tie their own shoes or insane or something.
'Youâre charged with assault with a deadly weapon and intent to issue menaces. Anything to say? - Yeah, we didnât actually go there, like, AGREEING or INTENDING to shoot anyone, just to intimidate them, you know? Give a scare, make 'em pee their pants, watch âem maybe scatter like scared rats. But âmenaceâ? No way. Itâs all their faults they got shot, cuz when they didnât get intimidated, we got scared they werenât scare enough, capeesh? So we had to kind of, you know, make the pointâ
Why wouldnât you treat it as hate crime? Given the circumstances whatâs to debate? These guys are young, dumb and done. Their lives are ruined. Thatâs what their hate got them.
FOX will call this an obvious racist arrest of three men who were profiled because they were white. And Alex Jones, FOXâs lead investigative reporter, will disclose the original attack was a black flag op run right out of the White House basement.
___Or any number of variations on that theme. ___in 3âŚ2âŚ
(*Donât laugh! With the loons at the Bagger and GOP propaganda machine at FOX, it could happen.)
Additionally, The Donald has already showed us what happens when a BLM protester shows up at a white GOP rally:
Getting that old Weimar feeling . . .
Without the fun of decadent nights at the Kit Kat Club
These 3 assholes have shitty timingâcurrent climate precludes any slap on the wrist. Theyâre looking at serious time.
I used to live in Minneapolis, left just over a year ago. Friends back there are reporting that when the shootings took place police pepper sprayed the BLM protesters and one officer reportedly told a protester that they had it coming after the shootings occurred. None of that surprises me, as Minneapolis has a long history of racially motivated overly aggressive police actions, as the police union keeps problem cops from being fired. The MPD also was picking up young people and feeding them drugs, then releasing them among the Occupy protesters a couple of years back so they could blame Occupy for drugs. The MPD has a lot of parallels with the Chicago Police.
I would love to know when âto protect and to serveâ turned into âto kill and to frame/blameâ.
It must just be my browser, but I donât see any caption for that photo. Is that them? Is that the police? When was it taken? Whatâs going on?
It definitely wasnât a âlove crime!â
Wouldnât anyone who shot a gun into a crowd of protesters at ANY time be facing attempted murder charges? I donât think the âcurrent climateâ has anything to do with that charge. Itâs the hate crime charge added to attempted murder that would be added at this time. As someone else above posted, âthis certainly was NOT a love crimeâ.
There are reports that this was a planned attack, why are these men being called racists, which they are, and not terrorists, which they also are?
I doubt they will get more than a slap on the wrist. After all, according to the right, BLM is a terrorist group and these young men were just protecting American values.
Let us identify these three men properly. They are thugs.
No, they are domestic terrorists.
And they should be treated as such.
Gawd I wish you werenât so right