I don’t see why not. If you can’t accept that you’re not going to agree with everyone on everything all the time, then you probably didn’t learn any of the other things you were supposed to learn in kindergarten either.
Moreover, it’s just strategically stupid. Why would you get rid of a potential ally on M4A, gun control, poverty or other things just because you disagree on one other thing? Purity testing = failure.
Which is essentially saying that people who view women as second-class citizens who don’t have the right to control their own bodies and healthcare are “welcome” in the party.
I’m 100% pro-choice, but thanks for illustrating the purists’ favorite trick: pretending that disagreeing with them means you agree fully with the opposite.
Because the idea that 300-some-odd idiots in Congress and however-many-million idiots all over the country all believe exactly the same things is fucking nonsense.
Lipinski is not only anti abortion, he voted against the ACA and the DREAM Act, and for allowing discrimination against LBGTQ folks and drug testing for unemployment benefits. The DCCC lined up for him last time, as the the Illinois Democratic Party and he won by only 2 points. Things have changed since then; I’ll be sending a few buck her way.
Look I am a woman and if it is your desire to force me to carry a child against my will you can go to hell and yea I will hate them and discard them over one thing,
What part of “I am 100% pro-choice” did you not understand? Is it the part where you don’t get to tell me I’m not pro-choice just because I won’t discard people who I disagree with on that issue but who agree with me on other issues?
The enemy of my enemy? Guess what…gun violence is our enemy, lack of insurance is our enemy, poverty, starvation and childhood malnutrition are our enemies, white nationalism is our enemy…the list is endless and we’re NEVER winning ANY battles with a tiny army of purists.