Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1402819
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Thank God. I was just thinking about this the other day and hoping that Breyer would do exactly this.
Just in time for Manchin and Sinema to ride in and insist on restoring the filibuster for SCOTUS appointments, because tradition, bipartisanship, civility, and how easy it is to get ten republicans to not filibuster a SCOTUS nominee.
I accept this is the right thing to do. ESPECIALLY after Mitch McConnell said if the GOP takes the Senate this mid-term Biden will get NO nominees on the court.
Breyer did not want to quit (I have not heard of any special medical issues lately for him) and the fact that he felt he HAD to sucks big time.
He reached the âWhatâs the point of this job?â phase. Must be hard working with zealots with life-time terms. Even the Supreme Court of Iran limits the terms of its justices to five years.
I completely understand the impulse here, burned as we have been so many times. But in this case, McConnell has fuck-all to do with it. Maybe Manchinema (and other âcentristsâ) will have some effect, but Bidenâs pick ought to go through with few shenanigans.
Yesâa version of saying the quiet parts, um, quietly.
This actually creates an interesting dynamic. Manchin and Sinema have both made subtle âdonât push meâ threats towards leaving the party for the GQP side. With a SCOTUS seat now in the balance, I wonder how that changes the math? Would they be more likely to change parties now, delivering the seat to McConnell in exchange for the assignments they most certainly wouldnât receive currently?
Well, as shitty as they are for a host of reasons, they have been good on federal judgeships as I understand it. Demanding an un-carving of McConnelâs 2017 carve-out would be pretty extreme. Ugh, thanks, now Iâm depressed.
I cannot imagine, nor do I want to imagine, the opprobriumânot all of it verbal, Iâd fearâthat would rain down on their heads if this were to happen. People surrounding Manchinâs yacht or chasing Sinema into a bathroom would be the least of their (and our) troubles.
Of course, for the sake of bipartisan comity and political âhealingâ, Biden must nominate a candidate that will satisfy Repubs even though none of them will vote for him or her, someone just slightly to the right of say Ted Nugent or Sidney Powell. In fact theyâd make splendid centrist nominees if only they werenât so darned liberal.
Thank you, Justice Breyer!
Guys, letâs not be defeatist right out of the gate. As someone else pointed out, Manchinema have been good on voting for judges. I will say this is one reason Iâve not been on the âtorch and scorch 'emâ bandwagon even though Iâm as mad and frustrated with them as anyone. JudgesâŚmatter. Supreme Court seats matter even more.
Now, will they use their leverage to force a less liberal candidate than many of us would like? Probably. Are their noses enough out of joint by the party blowback that they might revert to maximum pain-in-the-ass mode as candidates get floated? Possibly. But we donât have any real reason to believe theyâll go full turncoat.
These are the cards weâre dealt, and we should be looking at this as an opportunity.
ketanji jackson brown 51 and pretty liberal. She took Garlandâs job on the court when he went to AG. Letâs put someone on who is young and liberal.
Bless his grifting heartâŚIâve âheardâ he has money problemsâŚat least in his head.
Eh, heâs 83. Itâs a good time to retire (arguably overdue, even if he is in the pink of health) and get some fresh blood.
If Biden eats ice cream today it better be Breyerâs.
â NoelCaslerComedy (@caslernoel) January 26, 2022
hahahahahahaha Thatâs adorbs.
More comments with no mention of the senators from Az and WVa, please. Please.
It offers the chance of a new McConnell Rule: no Demonratâs nominee to the SCOTUS can be approved when a reactionary could, one day, be elected prezânent.