A retired Army colonel who circulated a PowerPoint document detailing a proposal to overturn the 2020 election results claimed to have visited the White House on multiple occasions after the election and met with then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, according to the Washington Post.
Seems appropriate that a ppt deck is used to bring down the US.
Uh-oh. Shades of the GW Bush Word doc, prepare for proof to come out that the guy never met with Meadows, followed by your Republican friends forever declaring the entire January 6 uprising a hoax 
“Circulator of Powerpoint” sounds like one of the series of honorifics for a GOT character.
Circulator of Powerpoint, Pivoter of Excel Tables, …
If Hitler had PowerPoint the Beer Hall Putsch would’ve been done better.
But all the henchmen would have been bored to tears and would have to have pretended to get up and use the john to avoid the mind numb.
“… that their communication was often through Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani,…”
Well there is the kink in the cable.
Wel,l if this doesn’t show the need to get rid of the Electoral College nothing does.
According to the Post, Waldron said that he contributed claims of foreign interference in the vote to the presentation, and brought up those same claims during his discussions with the White House.
Where are the claims? Obviously, they weren’t credible enough to convince anyone. And he sounds absolutely unapologetic. What a nutcase. What a fine representative of the US Army.
Ugh.
I am firewalled from WaPo. Is it in their post, what evidence he was claiming PROVED foreign interference (if this is the goddam CHINESE BAMBOO that is all over ‘some’ mail-in votes I will scream to the heavens) and I woud appreciate knowing what this man’s expertise is in the realm of ‘intelligence.’
The angle on this for Team Trump is this:
Nothing is True
Waldron recalled Meadows indicating that he would pass the list on to then-Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, but was unsure whether Meadows followed through on delivering it, according to the Post. A spokesman for Ratcliffe denied receiving the document to the Post.
Only the best people
A Guide to the Fauna of January 6th.
‘k’
But if nothing is true, how can claims that the election was stolen be true?
“Phil Waldron, a retired U.S. Army colonel, told the Post that he met with Meadows ‘maybe eight to 10 times’ and briefed several members of Congress…”
Go there. Go there! GO THERE!!!
OK…I’m confused. So there IS a PP circulating however Meadows was just the ‘receiver’ of the presentation? We’ve got Larry Sabato calling BS on this…or is it just the Meadows WROTE it? The rest is ‘true’ ad why did this Army Colonel come forward a year later?
It’s brought down many a project and company, so why not (especially if the old mantra of ‘the country needs to be run like a business’ is in place)?
On which of the seven phones???
"A [Republican] is self-assured simply because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe in the possibility of knowing anything fully.”
h/t Tolstoy