the socks. what about the socks?
ââŚWould that pep ya up some?â
âItâs a part of the Democratic partyâs campaign strategy to divide Americans based on skin pigmentation,â
Then why are the GOPers/Teatrolls the ones who are always saying the things (like what I just quoted) that do that job for them?
Iâve really tried to look at President Obamaâs rhetoric and positions objectively to see what they see, and I never see this at all.
I just donât get it. When does the president tell minorities that they are doing poorly because of racism? or anything similar for that matter?
He explained he believes members of the Democratic party win office by dividing the American electorate by race.
yes they are. by making sure all people have the right to vote. not allowing discriminatory hiring practices. trying to balance educational opportunities. helping the poorest to get nutrition. by voting for an african-american for president. these are devicive? no apologies here.
Sounds like youâre suggesting he hightail it to a refuge in Oregon.
âWhen youâre accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppressionâ - Unknown
Professional-Jection
âHeâs clearly the most racially divisive president weâve had since Iâve been alive,â he continued.
âAnd donât get me started on how divisive the Jews were in Nazi Germany!â
Well, to call Obama second to Lincoln, I, er, I guess thatâs quite a compliment!
âŚand I know all about the Negro!
Iâm always amazed how seemingly accomplished professionals can torture logic to arrive at a conclusion their own words contradict.
And of course, due to who he was speaking to, no one asked for the specific instances where Obama was clearly racist: direct quote statements not taken out of context (maybe âTravon Martin couldâve been my sonâ?); direct legislative proposals he made, both while President and as a Senator; maybe he made comments about âWhiteyâ and âWetbacksâ and âChinksâ?
You know? Iâm pretty sure he wonât be able to come up with any, directly attributable to the President. But you and I wouldnât have to work real hard to find those types of comments made by people who opposed him.
And theyâre already starting on the misogynistic comments with respect to Hillary. Someone yesterday made a statement about how she couldnât control her husband, how could she possibly be President? I responded that if marital relationships were a contingency for being a good President, then how did he explained the Sainted Ronald Reagan and his multiple marriages, including infidelity. Funny, how he had no answer.
As far as this numbnut is concerned, projection is everything.
Only to you white racist. The rest of us have been very pleased. You hate O because he is everything you are not. Smart, smooth, handsome, got a great wife and kids, and heâs not a racist. (And probably plays golf better than you too!)
Yea but Clinton was the first!
You have to put your super sekrit GOP Decoder Ring on to figure out what Rep. Brooks means:
âracially divisiveâ = âkeeps reminding us that there are Those People out thereâ
âeconomically divisiveâ = âkeeps reminding us that there are Poors out thereâ
This is standard republican speak. Whatever youâre doing thatâs negative, accuse the other side of doing it instead.
technically it is the half from his fatherâs side they have the problem withâŚ
Half is larger than one drop, after all.
honestly they really only hate Obama about 3/5 as much as they hate HillaryâŚ
or am I wrong and they hate the constitution.
The cognitive dissonance displayed by the individual members of the GOP is nothing short of astounding. And more than a little bit disgusting.