Websites Selling Abortion Pills Are Sharing Sensitive Data With Google

And public. :smirk:

17 Likes

Congressman Scott DesJarlais. TN-4 was a doctor who had an affair with one of his patients. Medical ethics be damned. After the woman told DesJarlais she was pregnant, he pressured her into getting an abortion. This is a doctor who was disciplined by his state’s medical board for dating patients- yes more than one.

He’s still a member of Congress. He still has Committee assignments. He’s a member in good standing in the GOP in spite of his personal habits running counter to his public GOP-supported views. He’s a member that has publicly voted against abortion rights, but privately pushed women in his life to get them. He was Hershal Walker before Hershal Walker, and yet he is still getting reelected.

In short, republicans don’t really care about this abortion stuff. Some want it outlawed, while others just want it outlawed in their state. They want to have access away for prying eyes in their states and districts- just in case.

27 Likes

The original and still the best.

13 Likes

DuckDuckGo is not a marketing arm of Microsoft. They did get caught with some MS trackers in their browser, due to their use of Bing as a search engine. They have since tightened up on their use of these.

7 Likes

Your comment might be a nice addition to the Rust Never Sleeps: Alec Baldwin thread in the Hive. There’s a lively conversation going on over there, if you’re interested.

5 Likes

24 Likes

Maybe just looking for this info will get you kicked out of high school - if not prosecuted - as a ā€˜corrupting influence’ or ā€˜drug dealer’.

Don’t discount the many ways a corrupt regime can ruin you. Esp if you lack friends in high places or high priced lawyers.

7 Likes

The best way to make sure you don’t mishandle data is to avoid collecting it in the first place.

Of course, that is incompatible with most online business models these days.

11 Likes

Do you know what’s up your nose? The flora may surprise you.

6 Likes

Thanks, will do.

2 Likes

Black Easter/ the Day After Judgement.

Now.

Someone needs to. Click baiting and attention mining is turning us into a nation of fat-ass angry zombies.

11 Likes

Thanks; I would hope.

8 Likes

Actually Charles Babbage said that.

7 Likes

Babbage was actually responding to Ada Lovelace saying ā€œNever put anything on a punch card that you wouldn’t put on a t-shirtā€,

9 Likes

As a TPM subscriber I am always glad to see Pro Publica articles re-printed here.

I often don’t have many comments to make, but I’m always glad I read them

18 Likes

Using Google analytics is almost required if you want to have a site that attracts visitors, and if you want to be able to promote your site online. How are these sites supposed to exist if they can’t be found?

I find the idea of Google analytics, overall, horrific. Essentially every company gives away their most valuable information, their customer list, to Google? Wtf is up with that?

6 Likes

OK. Let’s get some journalists who understand the technology and psychology to write about that. But it doesn’t have anything to do with whether some web pharmacy is sending your health data to Google (they aren’t). On the other hand, real-life pharmacies are perfectly happy to sell prescription flow data to drug companies, that’s a thing they’ve been doing for decades and as far as I can determine ProPublica has yet to seize on that story.

Another story that ProPublica ran this month was a highly misleading scaremongering ā€œWhat to Know About Cellphone Radiationā€ which made all kinds of false claims and inferences. I’d really prefer to not see their work reposted here. I just don’t think they have standards of journalism that are up to snuff.

1 Like

I just don’t see how you get ā€œcustomer listā€ from Google Analytics. The terms of service for Google Analytics expressly forbid passing any personally identifiable information to Google.

You will not and will not assist or permit any third party to, pass information to Google that Google could use or recognize as personally identifiable information.

How could it be any more clear?