Virginia’s attorney general has had enough, demanding that a conspiratorial state senator provide evidence for her “baseless” assertions that the upcoming election results will reflect Democratic cheating.
The story that O. Henry should have written, but didn’t.
The “no true scotsman fallacy” is certain to get a workout.
ETA.
According to VICE News, Todeschini also subscribes to the so-called “frazzledrip” conspiracy theory, a particularly violent piece of political fan-fiction assumed to be real by adherents which alleges that former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has been captured on video sexually abusing and torturing a young girl with a trusted longtime aide before using the child’s blood in a ritualistic fashion.
“This is proven beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty with physical, undeniable, irrefutable evidence,” he told the outlet, failing to provide any such evidence or proof.
They’re moving, in cyberland, they are switching inactive voters to active voters, all in the same week, it’s undetectable. I know what they’re doing, John,
Undetectable, huh? And yet she somehow picked up on it.
Facebook…I mean Meta…are you listening? She’s not only available, she shares your moral compass. Go get her, Zuck!
I’m not even getting an accusation like that out of her. I am taking what she said literally. “They’re moving, in cyberland, they are switching inactive voters to active voters, all in the same week, it’s undectable”.
So “cyberland” means the internet, where we all store files, and update files nowadays.
Inactive voters are people registered to vote, but have skipped out on voting in some current elections. Not that unusual, I consider myself a very active voter, but I have skipped some, especially if it is one item issue that I don’t care about either way.
“Switching inactive voters to active voters, all in the same week”-could this mean that someone checked their voter status? Thus the election board had contact with someone on the inactive list?
“all in the same week”- so what
“it’s undetectable”-no it’s not if you’re talking about it then the actions you are questioning are traceable.
The only good thing about these people is that I feel smarter every time they open their mouths to speak.
It’s the same thing as the mother freaking out about her son reading Toni Morrison’s Beloved in his AP Lit class. Ignore all the actual context that is relevant to the circumstances and issue a fatwa.
As much as Geraldo has fallen in my view, at least at one point in hid career he was an on the ground reporter, and investigative reporter. What has Tucker ever done but sit behind a desk?