Like we will stop any of that under this approach! He’s reassigned all the investigators to his fake ‘aliens’ roundup.
14 Likes
Once the lawsuits start against the DOJ and DOD for violation of 18 U.S. Code § 242, this bullsh*t will cost the Tax payers a lot of money. Sadly Trump will pardon anybody facing criminal proceedings.
But that still won’t prevent these crony’s from discovering that disbar is not a watering hole in Washington DC.
9 Likes
Looking forward to Marco Rubio adding FBI director to his ever-expanding portfolio of responsibilities.
3 Likes
Marco Rubio, the first man to capture the US Presidency by accretion?
10 Likes
That’s the point…
Someone gets a lifetime job with benefits.
2 Likes
Yup, yup. Goody, goody. 
2 Likes
Ya think 
..Matthew Alan Laiss, who is accused of voting in both Pennsylvania and Florida in the 2020 election. According to a federal indictment handed down in September, Laiss moved from Pennsylvania to Florida in August of 2020 and voted first with a mail-in ballot in Pennsylvania and then in person in Florida on election day. Both votes were for Trump, Laiss’s lawyers wrote in court documents. He has pleaded not guilty.
The case is still in its early stages. Last week, Laiss’s lawyers, public defenders Katrina Young and Elizabeth Toplin, argued that the charges should be thrown out because Trump had pardoned him.
They argued that Trump’s 7 November pardon was sweeping. It applies to any US citizen for conduct relating to the advice, creation, organization, execution, submission, support, voting, activities, participation in, or advocacy for or of any slate or proposed slate of presidential electors, whether or not recognized by any state or state official, in connection with the 2020 presidential election.” And while it lists a number of people the pardon specifically applies to, it also says the pardon is not limited to those named.
7 Likes
On the other hand, that any GOP members would criticize him makes me absolutely giddy.
5 Likes
Kelly and the others in that video weren’t expressing an opinion. They were reciting a law.
17 Likes
But stopping, seizing and arresting aren’t sufficient? What does their legal analysis have to say about that?
1 Like
A college friend explained to me long ago that the symbol has to be of the vampire’s religion. (The punchline was “Ve gunnish helfe.”) So for Miller I guess a pointy gold bar.
4 Likes
Little Eichmanns all the way down…
5 Likes
So here is my personal experience with the statement that Senator Kelly and his fellow military personnel in Congress made about members of the military don’t have to follow illegal orders.
I have a step brother who is currently in the Navy. My step brother followed his two uncles who were in the Navy during Viet Nam. Both uncles flew Navy fighter jets. During my step brother’s graduation from Naval Officer training in San Diego his Lt Commander Uncle Dan spoke at his graduation ceremony. Uncle Dan said exactly what Senator Kelly and the other former military Dems said. This happened during the Bush II first term when the US was fighting in Afghanistan.
I know that my stepmother is a Republican, but I have no idea if Uncle Dan was.
My point is the statement on members of the military do not have to follow illegal commands is not new. So why all the outrage? There seems to be a pattern of Republican Presidents not liking folks who question whether an order is legal or not. And by gum Hegseth should have known this when he served too.
17 Likes
The girlfriend will miss the FBI attention but, I’ll bet, she won’t miss patel.
4 Likes
The way I heard it was something like, “Gornisht helfn, bubele.” “Not gonna help, sweetie.”
2 Likes
Trump loudly and publicly gives a bunch of unlawful orders in response to Dems video saying, correctly, that members of the military should not obey unlawful orders.
I don’t think this will go well for them.
3 Likes
Striking how uniform the GOP has been in responding to “You shouldn’t obey unlawful orders” as if it was “you shouldn’t disobey orders.” I honestly think it shows that they have no conception of an unlawful order coming from Trump.
That is, their response perfectly exemplifies the glaring constitutional crisis that Kelly and the other Ds were responding to in the first place. In denouncing Kelly, they affirm the justice and rightness of what Kelly did.
10 Likes
Stephen King referring to Laura Loomer as ‘piggy’ is priceless! 
8 Likes
Can she pound it into her own chest?
3 Likes