Ignorant MAGATs probably don’t know who she is much less read the news, but good luck with that, Vickster.
1 Like
And I suspect she herself also started to believe she was above the law and impervious to investigation.
1 Like
That can happen without the vigorous defense of Trump’s right to slander with impunity, and without further expense to taxpayers.
1 Like
The fool she has for a client: Oh. My. God. They took my phone. The one I use for criming!
3 Likes
The government has already returned the phone. What she is appealing is the government keeping a copy of the data it took off of it.
The whole basis of their frantic and deeply frivolous demands to receive discovery on the fruits of search warrants before they’re indicted appears to me to be driven by an urgent need to find out if the government cracked encryption someone provided them and told them was unbreakable before they start running their mouths on Fox and OANN.
10 Likes
The special master will be the impartial third party who decides what material is legitimately covered by privilege.
4 Likes
I think you misspelled ‘blister.’
4 Likes
Which must please the Second Circuit no end.
If you don’t have respect for federal judges, it might be next-to-best practices to feign it in their [real or constructive] presence.
6 Likes
If that opportunity is passed over, she might learn respect for federal wardens and penitentiary officers instead.
1 Like
She should be aware that her phone is now EVIDENCE in a criminal case!
…to allow them to have a look at the materials collected under the warrants and review them before they made their way back to the prosecutors.
I demand to know which one of my crimes you’re investigating. Criminals have rights, dammit.
2 Likes
Ever since I first heard her and her husband’s names, before they ever worked for the former guy, I got a really foul vibe from their efforts. Then they started showing up on the dark side’s cable TV networks, pushing ideas that were first heard on Sputnik News and RT. Then they offered to work for 45 in direct opposition to efforts to hold him accountable under the laws and the Constitution.
I’m confident her phone had evidence of more crimes than just her own.
4 Likes
It’s true that neither of them would very likely have given a flying-squirrel about others’ attorney-client privilege claims if the shoe were on the other foot. And as it is, I’m sure that one or both of them are going to claim that this is “a partisan witchhunt” at some point… and likely one or both of them has made such a claim already. Neither of them is short on hypocrisy is the agreed upon point here.