The New York Times and Bank Nationalization | Talking Points Memo

My friend and former colleague covering the Clinton White House, David Sanger, has As I suggested last week, I don’t think nationalization is the best way to describe what’s likely to happen.I hasten to add that anyone who guesses what’s going to happen with this economy and the government’s response to it, is fooling themselves and this includes me. Like most observers I knew Fannie and Freddie were in trouble but, this time last year, even though I‘d been a longtime Fannie critic, I didn’t see them going into government conservatorship. But nevertheless I think “utilityization” is a better way of thinking about banks. They’re likely to stay in private hands and even be publicly traded but they’ll be out of the risky businesses–mortgage-backed securities, Alt A loans, etc–that brought us to this point and will become much more regulated just like providers of water and gas.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=146681