Letâs find out who paid for the plane ticket. I doubt it was paid in cash.
3 Likes
OK! As long as weâre gonna go thereâŚ
WTF is up with the wingtip running shoes? Is that a Florida Man thing?
1 Like
They say âclothes make the manââŚ
1 Like
Rick Wilson â who is definitely plugged into Republican politics in Gaetzâs district, hinted on Twitter that it was actually a private plane.
2 Likes
Well, Limbaughâs dead now soâŚ
Oh my! If I was walking down the hall towards these guys Iâd make a quick u-turn and run like hell! Pictures of the individual congressmen is bad enough. Getting them together is positively creepy, slimy, icky. (shudder)
1 Like
As I said on a post awhile back, Gaetz looks like the meth dealer told to dress up for his arraignment and Gym is the overworked PD who has been assigned to his case.
5 Likes
That sounds even better! Borderline Epstein, just need the private island for Matty to be in the big leagues.
1 Like
Weâre not actually aware of what Gaetz is and is not being investigated for.
I hope youâre less sloppy professionally than you are online. I mean, who fucks up âorâ for an entire day?
Or in Gaetzâs lexiconâŚârecategorize my generosity to ex-girlfriends as something more untowardâ
All of the reporting is that he is being investigated sex trafficking of a minor.
Heâs being Trumpf-level clever. He concocted the whole thing to divert attention from the rumours that he is gay.
Yuck
Did not age well. 
Has aged perfectly well. No reporting to date has alleged that the nudies Gaetz showed off to his buddies included the minor.
1 Like
Why are you insisting these are ONLY the things he is being investigated for as a fact?
If youâd stop changing your argument when youâre shown as being utterly feckless and factless that would be swell. Are you actually paid professionally to argue for folks. Holy crap. âOrâ is still your Krypton.
So, all these weeks later, you still canât tell the difference between underage sex trafficking under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 â a crime for which Gaetz is reportedly being investigated â and making child porn under 18 U.S.C. § 2251 â a crime for which he is not reportedly being investigated. Itâs right there in the text of § 2251: " . . . for the purpose of producing any visual depiction of such conduct or for the purpose of transmitting a live visual depiction of such conduct . . ."
1 Like
Where did I ever make such an argument? The answer is never.
Itâs amazing all the bullshit you invent me saying based on that. What is your problem with being so disgustingly dishonest when youâre shown as being an inept debater? Wow⌠and youâre paid? Holy fuck again.
Post no. 520, where you posted the inapplicable child porn statute:
If he didnât know she was under 18, why wouldnât he have been showing her pics?
If he did show pictures of her, would charges of kiddie porn stick?
2 Likes
Section 2251 would require the minor to have been trafficked for purposes of creating the child porn, which seems unlikely to be the case with Gaetz given what has been reported. I canât opine whether he would be in trouble under federal law for possessing or sharing naked images of a 17-year-old, though I imagine he would be at risk of state or D.C. charges.