That’s one cheap-lookin’ suit.
3 Likes
Unanimous first-ballot admission into the Wingnut Hall of Fame. He’s like a Babe Ruth of wingnuttery.
Let’s find out who paid for the plane ticket. I doubt it was paid in cash.
3 Likes
OK! As long as we’re gonna go there…
WTF is up with the wingtip running shoes? Is that a Florida Man thing?
1 Like
They say ‘clothes make the man’…
1 Like
Rick Wilson – who is definitely plugged into Republican politics in Gaetz’s district, hinted on Twitter that it was actually a private plane.
2 Likes
Well, Limbaugh’s dead now so…
Oh my! If I was walking down the hall towards these guys I’d make a quick u-turn and run like hell! Pictures of the individual congressmen is bad enough. Getting them together is positively creepy, slimy, icky. (shudder)
1 Like
As I said on a post awhile back, Gaetz looks like the meth dealer told to dress up for his arraignment and Gym is the overworked PD who has been assigned to his case.
5 Likes
That sounds even better! Borderline Epstein, just need the private island for Matty to be in the big leagues.
1 Like
We’re not actually aware of what Gaetz is and is not being investigated for.
I hope you’re less sloppy professionally than you are online. I mean, who fucks up ‘or’ for an entire day?
Or in Gaetz’s lexicon…“recategorize my generosity to ex-girlfriends as something more untoward”
All of the reporting is that he is being investigated sex trafficking of a minor.
He’s being Trumpf-level clever. He concocted the whole thing to divert attention from the rumours that he is gay.
Yuck
Did not age well. 
Has aged perfectly well. No reporting to date has alleged that the nudies Gaetz showed off to his buddies included the minor.
1 Like
Why are you insisting these are ONLY the things he is being investigated for as a fact?
If you’d stop changing your argument when you’re shown as being utterly feckless and factless that would be swell. Are you actually paid professionally to argue for folks. Holy crap. “Or” is still your Krypton.
So, all these weeks later, you still can’t tell the difference between underage sex trafficking under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 – a crime for which Gaetz is reportedly being investigated – and making child porn under 18 U.S.C. § 2251 – a crime for which he is not reportedly being investigated. It’s right there in the text of § 2251: " . . . for the purpose of producing any visual depiction of such conduct or for the purpose of transmitting a live visual depiction of such conduct . . ."
1 Like
Where did I ever make such an argument? The answer is never.
It’s amazing all the bullshit you invent me saying based on that. What is your problem with being so disgustingly dishonest when you’re shown as being an inept debater? Wow… and you’re paid? Holy fuck again.
Post no. 520, where you posted the inapplicable child porn statute: