A federal judge in Texas on Friday tossed out a lawsuit by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) that sought to overturn the presidential election won by Democrat Joe Biden.
Judge rules “no standing” in my lawsuit to toss fraudulent Biden electors. If I don’t have standing, no one does. When no one ever has standing, what good is a court system? My response on @Newsmax below #SaveTheRepublic#StopTheStealhttps://t.co/HLQCM6S5CE
For those asking why federal courts keep tossing election suits for lack of “standing,” rather than because the claims lack merit, they don’t have a choice.#SCOTUS doctrine *requires* federal courts to decide whether plaintiffs have standing *before* they can reach the merits.
The judge didn’t make a finding on the merits of Gohmert’s allegations. Judge Jeremy Kernodle, a Trump appointee in the Eastern District of Texas ruled that Gohmert and the Arizona electors who joined with him in the suit did not have standing to sue.
Gohmert pretends to be stupid and plays with fire.
This stems from the 1998 Steel Co. ruling—rejecting the doctrine of “hypothetical jurisdiction,” where courts had *assumed* standing in cases in which it was easier to reject plaintiffs’ claims on the merits. As Justice Scalia wrote for the Court, Article III doesn’t permit that.
So in a case in which plaintiffs lack standing (a jurisdictional defect) *and* have no viable claim on the merits, a federal court has no discretion to actually hold that there’s no merit; it *must* dismiss for lack of standing—or else it’s committing reversible error.
Gohmert isn’t just a member of Congress; he’s one of the senior Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee—tasked with regulatory and oversight authority over federal courts. And he’s a former state trial and appellate judge.