Judge Throws Out Gohmert Lawsuit Seeking To Empower Pence To Overturn Election Results | Talking Points Memo

A federal judge in Texas on Friday tossed out a lawsuit by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) that sought to overturn the presidential election won by Democrat Joe Biden.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1351739
1 Like

I told y’all Jeremy was a good guy.

46 Likes

A hard slap to the face heard nationwide…

30 Likes

They’re suing Pence in order to establish that Pence has some extraordinary, heretofore unknown powers. What could possibly go wrong?

We’ve also now determined that being butt-hurt by the results of an election is not sufficient to confer standing. Who knew?

43 Likes

Gohmert continues and he knows this goes nowhere.

Judge rules “no standing” in my lawsuit to toss fraudulent Biden electors. If I don’t have standing, no one does. When no one ever has standing, what good is a court system? My response on @Newsmax below #SaveTheRepublic #StopTheSteal https://t.co/HLQCM6S5CE

— Louie Gohmert (@replouiegohmert) January 2, 2021

For those asking why federal courts keep tossing election suits for lack of “standing,” rather than because the claims lack merit, they don’t have a choice.#SCOTUS doctrine *requires* federal courts to decide whether plaintiffs have standing *before* they can reach the merits.

— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 2, 2021
40 Likes

The judge didn’t make a finding on the merits of Gohmert’s allegations. Judge Jeremy Kernodle, a Trump appointee in the Eastern District of Texas ruled that Gohmert and the Arizona electors who joined with him in the suit did not have standing to sue.

13 Likes

Such an intelligent guy. To be continually stymied by so many others must be frustrating.

6 Likes

Remember this asshole was actually a Texas Judge

16 Likes

Yup. He’s put the seedy in sedition.

39 Likes

See ya Nov. 6

1 Like

Except in East Texas…

12 Likes

Is “gohmert” a verb yet?

17 Likes

It’s hard to hear when Ted Cruz has his tongue in your ear canal.

12 Likes

Ewwww!

10 Likes

Gohmert pretends to be stupid and plays with fire.

This stems from the 1998 Steel Co. ruling—rejecting the doctrine of “hypothetical jurisdiction,” where courts had *assumed* standing in cases in which it was easier to reject plaintiffs’ claims on the merits. As Justice Scalia wrote for the Court, Article III doesn’t permit that.

— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 2, 2021

So in a case in which plaintiffs lack standing (a jurisdictional defect) *and* have no viable claim on the merits, a federal court has no discretion to actually hold that there’s no merit; it *must* dismiss for lack of standing—or else it’s committing reversible error.

/end

— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 2, 2021

Gohmert isn’t just a member of Congress; he’s one of the senior Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee—tasked with regulatory and oversight authority over federal courts. And he’s a former state trial and appellate judge.

He knows better, even if those he’s scamming don’t. https://t.co/lf97PY60Bp

— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 2, 2021
36 Likes

How about tossing out Gohmert?

17 Likes

You know you shouldn’t bait me like that! :rofl:

3 Likes

Who’d take him in?

4 Likes

It will not be Trump.
He hates losers.

2 Likes

But Gomer is such a thoughtful dude. Surely, he wouldn’t sign on to a frivolous lawsuit

3 Likes