Oh, man, those were some awesome historical artefacts that you destroyed. Victorian death rituals are very interesting, especially how they used newfangled technology to memorialize the dead (which was not considered morbid Back In the Day).
Were they by chance the only extant photos of those relatives? Given the expense of formal portraiture, it was not unusual that the only photo ever taken of someone was at their death–even shots of entire families with, say, a dead sibling in a coffin.
It was all part and parcel with other awesome traditions such as hair art, which strikes me as actually being more morbid than decorously arranged family death photos. I suppose because the hair once belonged to living people and photos are just witnesses?
I once told my husband that I wanted to buy some Victorian hairwork and he absolutely shut that down immediately: even if it were never displayed, just knowing that it was in the house would be enough to creep him out.
So, I knew that the 19th century wicker cooling coffin was out of the question–plus, I wasn’t sure how I would display something so unwieldy, so I guess it was just as well?