Throughout her questioning by the Jan. 6 committee, Ginni Thomas sporadically makes her displeasure known.
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1443657
Throughout her questioning by the Jan. 6 committee, Ginni Thomas sporadically makes her displeasure known.
She is without shame and only regrets her texts to Meadows and letters to state legislators were released.
ETA: Also interesting that her attorney admonished her and basically told her to shut up.
I don’t know how many of you would want your texts to become public on the front page of the Washington Post,” she says.
“Never put anything into an email that you don’t want read back to you in a court of law.” – Warren Buffet
“You know what it means,” she snaps at the questioner who’s asking her to explain a concept in one of her emails. “Are we done?” she asks a couple of times,
All that’s missing is a “Don’t you know who I am???”
Norma Desmond
If I was committing treason with my friends, I wouldn’t either.
She
seems like
such
a
lovely
person…
Thomas said… that she wasn’t involved in any high-level schemes to get the election tossed.
“Just the low-life-level ones.”
Also this:
“Never do anything in life if you would be ashamed of seeing it printed on the front page of your hometown newspaper for your friends and family to see.”
— Warren Buffett
Meanness is not an emotion from a scheming conniving POS.
“No, except, you know, I can certainly look at those
wonderfulperfect Mark Meadows texts that were made public by the committee…”
I don’t imagine Ginni’d have any qualms about seeing it if her efforts had borne fruit and Donnie, with his picked administration, was now serving his next term.
Power corrupts
should become her mantra
You beat me to it. 

The Linda Tripp is strong with this one.
So his name was Emmett, you say, and you just love all the attention.
Absolutely.
It sounds like Clarence was angry once again when he found out what she had been up to after she had made all those promises that she was being careful this time and no one would find out.
“High-level” ???
Mark Meadows must feel insulted that his position as POTUS Chief of Staff is not considered “High Level.”