A mentally disturbed person who now answers to the name “Ye”.
Study up on the linguistic difference between a verb and its object. “Ballot” is an object of “tamper.” “Election” is not an object of “tamper.”
Is he even capable of wiping himself or has he reverted to the right hand technique?
We all make mistakes.
I once dated a Baptist.
She stole your liquor, didn’t she?
Study up on the meaning of the noun “prick” as opposed to the verb form of the word.
Relationship didn’t last long enough for her to find it. She took me home for Christmas and, while walking the streets her pappy greeted a black man as “Uncle”.
My man, I can’t help it if you lack proficiency in the use of nouns, verbs, and objects. Suffice to say that your “prick” sobriquet shall be worn as a badge of . . . honor? No, more like complete indifference.
Now go forth and “tamper” with something else that isn’t in the statute, if it suits you to do so for no particular purpose.
So t\hey were Orthodox Baptist.
Since I don’t have a lack of said proficiency you are correct, you can’t help me with it.
person commits the offense of tampering with evidence when, with the intent to prevent the apprehension or cause the wrongful apprehension of any person or to obstruct the prosecution or defense of any person, he knowingly destroys, alters, conceals, or disguises physical evidence or makes, devises, prepares, or plants false evidence.
I once baptized a Dadaist.
Well we agree on one thing! (Note: There are two things in your sentence. I’m with you on the dependent clause.)
Why’nt the two of you both declare victory and agree that you both pissed five feet?
deeebusss…
Nonsense.
No way…
Disqualifying ballots wouldn’t “conceal” them. They’d still be right there in meatspace. Shoving 11.800 ballots into a desk drawer would “conceal” them, but that would be stupid.
Because I am right and he is wrong, as should be obvious.

Maybe.
Just don’t step on your dick trying to prove it.
Me: Noun, verb, object.
You: Pukes.
Got it.