Just trying to think about this logically. If Hunter Biden put out a statement saying he has never been to that repair shop in his life, then the story would immediately shift away from his e-mails and toward Russian hacking and collusion. If you can play that card, why wait?
OT, this is just fucking pathetic and shows he’s going to try to turn every fucking question into a launchpad to make accusations about Hunter, China and Muslims…
The point being giving a false story oxygen by denying it only amplifies the original story (since reporters now have to report on what you’re denying for context).
So the safer option is to usually ignore it, since you can’t prove a negative (and Hunter can’t prove that he’s never been to a specific location like that, so it would become he said/he said).
The funniest part of that story is that there was no basement there. They used basement pictures from another location.
The best part of the story is that the wacko who came to “investigate” the allegations didn’t shoot anyone.
It was stated he was “blind” in another article I read. This is from another article on Zero Hedge. A rightwing website.
Apparently, although Isaac’s blindness prevented him from positively ID-ing Hunter Biden, it didn’t stop him from viewing the contents of the hard drive.
John Kerry ignored the lies told about his service record in 2004 and paid dearly. Personally I’m in favor of getting the truth out, especially if it exonerates you. And even if it gives the story oxygen.
“The intelligence raised concerns that Giuliani was being used to feed Russian misinformation to the president…"
I think that phrase would be more accurate if it said that, “Giuliani was knowingly feeding Russian misinformation to the president to use as ammunition against Biden during the campaign…"
I honestly believe that Ghouliani is acting as a fully aware and active conduit for Russian intelligence, and is not being ‘unwittingly duped’ at all.
If my presumption is incorrect, then he is dangerously stupid and ignorant…