And they need that job now that prices have gone through the roof they suddenly can’t afford without it. The more you work the more money you need to survive and the more money you need to survive the more you have to work. That way we can become the epitome of Western evolution from Cro-Magnon Man to Consumer Man.
I’m hoping the Castro Regime decides to go slowly and remain in control, as perverse as that may sound. My goal would be more of the social progression demonstrated by China, with an opening of the culture and introduction of cultural/capitalist norms that will allow new generations of Cubans to embrace opportunities while maintaining some sort of cultural integrity. Russia went through such a radical change in such a short period that Putin was able to easily grab power and move democracy back a generation or more.
2 Likes
I’m thinking much the same. The regime needs to move slowly and deliberately in allowing American Corporate interests to come in. The people of Cuba should be the parties to benefit economically and not those who fled the country and now have the money to go back in to capitalize from it.
The regime needs to find a means of ensuring that Cubans reap the bulk of the economic rewards instead of outsiders. But can they be entrusted to do this?
1 Like
If you traveled thru India and SE Asia as you said then you contributed as much to the “problem” you so detest as any of the folks you are so pissed at. Look to your self before you dump on others.
1 Like
So, you’re saying that you prefer rich spoiled tourist straw men over other phony outrage-inducing, manufactured straw men? Hey, what ever floats yer boat, Inny, but you seem to have a chip on your shoulder. Maybe it’s time for you to move out and get a job?
Yeah, there’s the rub, isn’t it? At the least, I think there will be several million Americans interested in trading nice new cars for restorable vintage cars purported to be down in Cuba.
Nice avatar!!!2SWQq@!!q!!2qQ1!@2!!!1!!!
Hello Senor Darr. Haven’t seen you in a while, but still offering good stuff, as usual.
Oh, I’ve been here, never worry. Back in the day and many times since I’ve crossed the pond and seen exotic places much as InmanRoshi has. I just don’t agree with his take on backpackers. I’ve done both. Backpaked and stayed in nice places. My secret to good experiences while traveling is to treat folks with respect and dignity. it’s simple really.
What exactly does that even mean? People have such weird ideas today about what headlines are, should be, really everything about them. But really, I’m curious what it even means that the headline was “trolling TPM’s readers”.
Sorry, it’s always bugged me that the Cuban exiles never tried to or wanted to assimilate, and politicians of both parties had to pander to them to avoid the ‘soft on Communism’ label. My ancestors fled the worst disaster in 19th century history and by the second generation had moved out of the self-imposed ghettos and fully identified with the American dream. Yeah, the island isn’t frozen in time, and yeah, the poor writer’s family escaped with their lives and hard cash, but for her dad to raise her in the “we’re going back and taking up our old life as soon as the US gets rid of Castro” attitude is simply ridiculous. I for one welcome the end of this ridiculous policy - maybe we can finally be rid of Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and her ilk.
I thought the headline took a multi-layered story – about the author’s complicated feelings about being the granddaughter of Cuban expats, the differing viewpoints amongst Cuban-Americans of different generations, the authors feelings about never having visited Cuba, about Cuba’s isolation and impoverishment by U.S. policy, as well as Cuba being a country many Americans probably have overly-romanticized notions, and which focused on that final aspect and reduced it to “Here’s why you, the reader, are screwed-up about Cuba”. I thought making the headline about the intended reader was overly provocative, and in a sense objectified the author: “I, as a 3rd generation Cuban-American, am defined by your romanticized notions and your desire to
visit Cuba, and I resent it”.
I’ve re-read the article; the author actually spends more time on how she feels about “disaster-tourism” (the aspect of the article the headline evokes) than I first realized, and my reactions to the headline would have been more appropriately directed towards the article itself.
And I shouldn’t have generalized about TPM’s headlines based on a single headline without being prepared to back it up with some sort of cogent argument. I really do not like the expression “I try not to shit where I eat”, but I usually do try to avoid doing that, especially when the eating is completely cost-free to me. I spend a lot of time at TPM. If I didn’t appreciate it I wouldn’t spend the time here.
I understand your point about people’s attitudes toward headlines. I could probably discuss this with myself ad nauseam – “on the one hand; on the other hand” (I have many hands). I’m still not a fan of the headline, but I’m glad you called me out on it (though at this point you’re probably regretting it) and hope this helps.
Oh, okay. Would you like to hear about my trips to the Jersey shore, instead?
It seems like if the “small amount in a U.S. bank account” was enough to buy a house, it must have been the equivalent of about $150,000 in today’s dollars. What kind of racket was the “import/export” business?
i don’t understand how it comes about that the government prior to the revolution never gets any mention in these discussions. Sorry, really, but if the author’s grandparents amassed considerable wealth in pre-revolution Cuba, they did so under the protection of a vicious and murderous dictator. As that radical leftwing rag The Economist noted in the immediate aftermath of the revolution, there was initially no expectation that the economics of the island would change. However, as was often the case, American Cold War policies drove Castro straight to Moscow, first class passage.
Stop glorifying the rule of the island’s previous dictator.
1 Like
Quite so, @naugiedoggie. The author inherits from her forebears a sense of entitlement and superiority which she is almost comically unaware of in this piece as she assumed her position of false superiority and sniffs at those who are curious to visit the island. As a person born and raised in the United States of America, her notion that Cuba is her “motherland” reflects very well (again unconsciously) that the author is from a privileged ghetto of people whose connections to the white ruling class and, in many cases, organized crime not only made them a ton of money but also gave them the sense that their stay in the United States was “temporary” and that they were using the U.S. and not interested integrating. This is the only group of immigrants that was showered with gifts upon arrival in the U.S., including being given Radio Martí, and yet their allegiance has never been to the U.S.A. but rather to their self-righteous idea that their wealth in Cuba was stolen from them. They sent their children to the US well before they themselves left the island to keep them from being drafted to take part in progressive programs like the alphabetization campaigns in the countryside. And let it not be forgotten that the Miami Cubans sponsor and protect violent terrorists amongst them, including the criminals associated with CANF and Brothers to the Rescue. Indeed, the most important and interesting aspects of this article are written between the lines.
3 Likes
I appreciate this post very much. Thank you.
My father came from a wealthy family. He was a med student in his last year of residency. He threw a grenade at Batista, went home packed and got on a plane to New York with $50 in his pocket. The social unrest scene in Cuba at that time is hardly as black and white as you so naively paint it.
1 Like
This article perfectly captures the aggrieved, entitlement mentality of many Cuban exiles.