Don’t know about Clinton, but the comparable number for Obama is 3. And he probably had made more appointments than #45 to the White House staff. The NYT article yesterday is informative for context:
"The number of waivers rose during the Obama administration because Mr. Obama imposed new ethics rules, such as a ban on hiring lobbyists, which could be avoided only with a waiver.
“With these broad restrictions in place for the first time, the Obama administration issued a relatively small number of waivers. Over Mr. Obama’s eight years in office, about 16 waivers were granted for White House officials and a total of about 70 across the entire federal government. Just three of those waivers for White House staff members came in the first four months of his administration.”
What good are ethics rules if people can be granted waivers? I thought this country was over the notion that if the president does it it’s legal. It’s not supposed to work this way.
“The White House has voluntarily released the ethics waivers as part of
the President’s commitment to the American people to be transparent,”
Walters said in a statement.
How special. The White House has voluntarily demonstrated the wool it’s pulling over the Public eye. Draining the swamp and displacing it with t*rds are distinctly different concepts.
What use could that woman possibly be to anyone? And please, if anyone can think of anything to answer that question, please keep it to yourself. There are some visions that i would most gratefully live without.