Discussion: WH Spox: 'No Good Reason' For Lame Duck Confirmation Of Garland

Discussion for article #247504

Republicans need to get one of their Wall Street donors to explain how a hedge works. (Hint: you don’t get to call the coin toss after you’ve seen how it landed.)

25 Likes

Waiting for the lame-duck session would be kind of like insider trading (which of course never happens on Wall Street).

10 Likes

ā€œHaving the process break down would be an unprecedented injection of partisan politics into the Supreme Court.ā€

I kind of thought Bush v. Gore was the ā€œunprecedented injection of partisan politics into the Supreme Courtā€.

31 Likes

ā€œThere’s absolutely no good reason to wait until the lame duck for the Senate to fulfill their duty to the constitution and to the American people.ā€

Wait, Josh. Republicans say their stance is based on a time-honored ā€œprincipleā€ of ā€œFuck Obama and the Kenyan horse he rode in on.ā€ It shall heretofore be applied in the first, last years and every one in between of any nonwhite president now and in the future. Otherwise their GOP party gets out of control angry and nominate crazy people to be the president that follows.

16 Likes

The Republicans need to double down and go all in. That will show the nation that they mean what they say on camera.

2 Likes

Teatroll Rosetta Stone: ā€œOf course we’ll save ourselves from a more liberal nominee if we lose in November and you let us.ā€

What Obama SHOULD be saying: ā€œI’m withdrawing his nomination as of November 7, 2016 if you have not acted by then. Pick your poison.ā€

22 Likes

Translated from ā€œPresidential statementā€ to english, that’s almost exactly what Earnest’s comments say.

1 Like

Of course there’s a good reason, because, you know, pretzel logic.

1 Like

The reason … that they don’t want to fill the vacancy is because it’s the only issue the GOP has left
that they think will get their base to the polls —

Some republicans are already talking about staying home ---- Giving the Dem’s a landslide —

McConnell’s last hope is to use this as a " get out and vote" issue —

6 Likes

But but but that was a gop thingy. Completely constitutional because it was what the american people wanted, So they say.

It’s because the GOP is trying to ā€˜re-define’ what lame duck MEANS…they want it to be the fourth year of any Democrat’s Presidency.

2 Likes

Today, I'm proud to nominate Chief Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court. No one is more qualified to serve our country right now in this critical role. Judge Garland has earned bipartisan praise as one of the best appellate judges in the country - a brilliant, meticulous jurist with a reputation for building consensus. He has dedicated his life to public service, choosing to serve our country and take on some of the most difficult and significant anti-terrorism cases in America's history including prosecuting Timothy McVeigh in the wake of the Oklahoma City bombing. But beyond the courtroom, Judge Garland is a committed mentor and dedicated family man, advising hundreds of law clerks and tutoring elementary school kids in reading and math.I said I would take this process seriously, and I did. I chose Merrick Garland. **Take a few minutes to watch this video and meet him for yourself**. I'm confident you will share my belief that Chief Judge Merrick Garland is not only eminently qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice, but that he deserves a fair hearing and an up-or-down vote in the Senate. I have fulfilled my Constitutional duty. Now it's time for the Senate to do theirs.

Posted by President Obama on Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Thank you, Mr. President. I hope our other elected officials realize the time for silly games has long passed. It’s time for the adults in the room to re-take the reins.

33 Likes

Translation: We’re going to slide the knife in slow.

6 Likes

ā€œGet over it.ā€

Antonin Scalia.

2 Likes

Donald Trumps hears reigns when that word is used.

7 Likes

Josh Ernest:

Stalling his nomination and preventing him from serving on the Supreme Court at the beginning of the next term would be obstruction on a scale that is unprecedented in the last 40 years or so.

The last 40 years?

Josh, I think you have to go back 20 years before the Civil War (i.e., more than 170 years) to find this level of obstruction - and at least that Congress had the excuse that <a href"John Tyler - Wikipedia">John Tyler wasn’t elected President, having inherited the office when William Henry Harrison died a month after his inauguration.

Plus, Tyler was about as popular in Congress - even within his own party - as Ted Cruz is today, and he was a pro-slave states rightist who eventually joined the Confederacy about 15-16 years after leaving the presidency.

7 Likes

I like the idea, but I’m thinking the president should wait until September or October to make that announcement - i.e., fuck with their heads and throw’em into further disarray right before the election.

4 Likes

What Obama should do is give the senate a month to get off their asses and act. After that he should state that, with no objections from the Senate, Judge Garland is now Justice Garland.

7 Likes

Why oh why does President Obama and his spokesman keep acting like adults?!

Damn them.

6 Likes