Discussion: WH Punts On Funding Shutdown Threat: ‘We Wanna See What The Senate Can Pass’

Oh c’mon…you don’t need the SENATE. Just belittle and demean and whine and snivel when you don’t ‘agree’. Isn’t that the WH way these days?

6 Likes

Who wants to go chasing rainbows with the WH and find all those pots of gold the finance leprechauns left laying around?
I’m going to submit the argument that all federal revenue comes from taxes and fees.

9 Likes

Nigerian emails have more believable cons than this flim-flam crew.

15 Likes

It is all BS.

4 Likes

8 Likes
2 Likes

What? No Trump Shutdown for Xmas?

6 Likes

“We’re disappointed in the fact that [the Senate has] yet to actually vote on something and pass something. When they do that, we’ll make a determination on whether or not we’re going to sign that.

7 Likes

“I would use attorneys that work here at the White House and in agencies that— that’s their entire job, is determining whether or not something is legal, and we’re looking to those individuals to find out those specific pots of money that can be used for that,” she said.

Trump should take his $5 billion from the VA. A lot of those guys were captured, so they don't deserve it anyway.
5 Likes

1 - But trade benefits go to private citizens, a reporter objected, not the U.S. Treasury.

2 -“He’s talking about the general revenue that comes from that,” Sanders responded.

3 -. So a tax? the reporter asked.

4 -. “No, we’re not taxing,” Sanders said. “We’re talking about additional revenue that wouldn’t have existed without the President getting a new deal.”

5- GOTO 1

14 Likes

What do you mean what the senate can pass? The senate does not control the purse strings. Nancy does.

Fuckwits.

12 Likes

I would say less “cryptically” than “facetiously.”

She added, cryptically: “There have a been a number of things that we’ve looked at in which we know will have additional revenue that comes in through the USMCA.”

3 Likes

They’ve done that gag before

The major difference is however an upcoming and obvious one.

11 Likes

Yeah - that was the GOP House.

It is no longer.

6 Likes

the Underwear Gnomes theory of wall funding

  1. Negotiate NAFTA revisions
  2. ???
  3. World domination (and Wall funding)
5 Likes

And the next speaker is likely going to weld that gavel, as if it were Thor’s hammer.

8 Likes

So far she is using it like Wonder Woman’s entire toolbox and she hasn’t even been sworn in yet.

So yes, she will. I think she’s itching to get going and put the brakes on some of the cray cray.

13 Likes

Soapy Smith would be proud.

3 Likes

I know. Sometimes I think Trump mistakes tariffs for taxes – remember Spicer, early on, telling reporters that limited tariffs on Mexico would raise the money in no time. But then I sometimes think he conflates them so his dummy followers will mistake tariffs for taxes. Either way, reporters need to keep hammering on this one. So absurd!

7 Likes