Any bets on whether she lies about Trump’s tweet to Gillibrand? I bet she’ll defend “…and would do anything for them…” as being just a colloquial turn of phrase with no sexual connotations whatsoever.
Please, WH Press:
Don’t ask about the tweet(s)… ask -
Will the President push for CHIP funding restoration before Christmas?
Will the President support adding DACA to the government funding bill?
Will the President extend the sign-up period for people already in the process of getting health insurance on the exchanges?
Does the President support the automatic $25 billion cut in Medicare that will result from the current tax proposal?
Does the President support Paul Ryan’s plans to gut Social Security & Medicare/Medicaid to pay for the tax proposal?
Ask about substance… make them pivot to the distraction stories.
To bet she’ll tell the truth I think I’d need some pretty exciting odds. She’ll say of course he meant she’d do anything politically because she’s a Democrat and thus bottomlessly corrupt duh and it’s sickening and frankly insulting to suggest anything else you sick people I pity you. Like that. We’ve heard too much of that to expect anything different. I can’t afford to bet anyway.
Any bets as to whether or not Sanders is the one giving the briefing?
What are the chances she lies about threatening Acosta for asking about Trump’s own words?
Today, on a very special episode of the Glower Hecklebee-Zeigler Show: Glower explains to the Fake News Press how her three eyewitnesses do too totally exonerate Trump of all accusations of sexual harassment and their minds are filthy, dirty little sex dungeons for even thinking Trump’s Gillibrand tweet was in any way meant to be sexist.
Impossible to watch Suckabee’s daily cavalcade of lies and excuses. Please make her go away.
Government officials dictating what questions they can and cannot be asked. We’ve heard many false cries of “censorship,” but that’s a real instance of it. It’s not how things are done in America. We need a new, I hope temporary, name for the country we live in now.
Another day in Trumpistan.
Prediction, the following will occur.
- Intense disdainful eye rolling
- Momentary attempt at camaraderie, ephemeral may be better as a choice of words
- Jocularity over some insignificant question
- Spikey anger and admonishment on a tough question. (Similar to when she finds her kids ate all of the potato chips and there is nothing left to go with the beer)
- Jaw movements like the wad of chewing gum broke loose from the molar she plastered it to.
- Brevity on any tough question if option. 4 has not kicked in accompanied with the stock “Next Question”
- Mein Fuhrer! style compliance to her dear leader’s message if there is no logical out.
- Pained expression similar to someone suffering lower gastrointestinal difficulties when her brain is challenged by a question requiring parsing. (Her classic look)
Did I miss anything?
I can’t believe Trump is going to waste his authoritarian rule and not even get a pastry named after himself. If I were a dictator, the first thing I’d do is commission the Austin Dave Torte or Roll or Struedel.
A Trumpoleon sounds more like a floor covering.
She’ll repeatedly refer to this country as the United “Shtatesh” and insist that’s the correct way to say it and always was.
Ok, that is nostalgic almost. Can she say Nuclear correctly?
No bet, because we all know that Sarah H. “woiuld do anything” for dear leader Trump.
It’s up to the MSM. If they can’t get the word out that Trump’s not upset about the media lying. He’s pissed because they are finally telling the truth. They deserve all that Sanders and the Trump clan give them if they can’t fix that. They made a killing on “Al Gore said he invented the Internet”, “John Kerry didn’t earn his medals” and “we just don’t know where Obama was born”. So fuck them right up the ass if Trump beats them up.
Wow, briefing at 3! WH badly wants to kill all this sexual harassment fake news. This one should be good. Keep the volume up!
If he goes away, she goes away.
Priorities!