Discussion for article #226962
But Shaheenâs lead has essentially evaporated in public and party-funded polling.
Itâs one poll that shows that. My goodness, you know that there are outliers in polling, right? Shaheen shouldnât rest easy but for Peteâs sake, the race hasnât actually âbecome tiedâ â or at least, the data doesnât support that yet.
Click, click click
Wow, imagine if we could all just count our assets and not our debts.
âShaheenâs wealth has surged while in public office.â False
But has Brownâs wealth surged while [and since being] in public office.?
I looked at the real clear politics site, and discovered that the polling average gives Shaheen a 6.6 lead. There is only one poll that is within the margin of error, which gives Shaheen a 2 point lead, and that poll appears to be an outlier. I think it is time TPM told us where it comes up with its conclusion that Shaheenâs lead has evaporated in all the polling, and if so why?
Good thing these PACs canât coordinate with candidates, because Brown might be embarrassed by these inaccuracies. Ha ha.
Poor Scott. Drifting along to a foregone conclusion of political failure.
Your right about TPM
And look at the period of time they are asserting her wealth went up ⌠2008 to 2013.
MY âwealthâ, such that it is, doubled from its low point after the crash in 2008 to where it is now when the Dow is over 17K.
These manipulators really make me cranky!