“No,” Pierson responded, arguing that a younger generation of voters was unfamiliar with the ins and outs of Bill and Hillary Clinton’s White House years.
So, she’s saying that just because Millenials don’t know about her time in the Was First Lady that constitutes not being vetted?
OK. I want them to run with this.
I just burst out laughing when I heard her say this on Tamara Hall’s show. Like or dislike Hillary, she has been thoroughly vetted! This dog don’t hunt.
Thank FSM we’ll get to hear more from this intelligent, well-spoken person for the next seven months. I can never get enough of her.
“Best Defence is a Good Offence”
And GEEZ, these people offend.
He is taking a page from the Rove playbook. Attack your opponent on your own biggest weakness.
“Hurricane” Katrina will be a gift that keeps on giving. A disaster waiting to happen each time she opens her mouth to speak.
Exactly.
On another note…The main thing I am concerned with right now is the number of Republicans who are not Krazy.
How many of THEM are voting for Hillary (or not voting) in the General?
Never been vetted? Of all the absurd claims that Trump has leveled, that’s up there in top top five easily. She could be the most vetted candidate in American history.
Never been vetted? Served as a senator and Secretary of State and never vetted? This person is delusional. But then we have seen it from her before.
Every repub who sits out the election is a vote for the democrats
As usual, she’s not saying what she means.
“No,” Pierson responded, arguing that a younger generation of voters was unfamiliar with the ins and outs of Bill and Hillary Clinton’s White House years.
When she says “unfamiliar” she means - Monica, Whitewater, Vince Foster etc.
Bring it on.
This simpleton hasn’t seen vetting until she experiences the torrent of truth telling that’s about to be unleashed on Chump. If there’s one thing about which the Clinton machine shouldn’t be underestimated, it’s political gamesmanship.
There is probably no one on earth more vetted than Clinton. The only things hanging over her head are the FBI investigation (likely nothing) and the $12M in speeches to Wall Street influence purchasers (undoubtedly something, or the transcripts would have been released long ago). Even Henry Kissinger thinks she’s OK.
But this isn’t about convincing the committed on either side. It’s a battle over the margins. On that count, it remains to be seen whose future vetting will prove resilient.
In your estimation, how many will there be?
“well that was quick…”
After Hall expressed skepticism, Pierson repeated, “Never been truly vetted before.”
“I just want to make sure that we’re clear on this," Hall replied. "The former secretary of state, you talk about the money spent against Donald Trump to perhaps demonize him. The millions of dollars that have been spent against the Clintons, both as a first lady and the secretary of state and a senator for the state of New York, which she has received contributions from your candidate, that this—that Hillary Clinton has not been properly vetted?”
“No,” Pierson responded, arguing that a younger generation of voters was unfamiliar with the ins and outs of Bill and Hillary Clinton’s White House years.
Pierson also suggested that Clinton’s role in responding to the 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya had not been sufficiently investigated, although Clinton testified about the attacks before a Republican-led congressional committee for 11 hours in October.
well that proves it #Omorosa is better
Trump, Pierson added, was “in the process of being vetted,” and noted that he’d “only been a politician for the last 10 to 11 months.”
The following is 51 minutes of exhibit a
Enjoy
The entire Trump apparatus is divorced from reality. Pierson is merely taking the lead from Donald. Reality is just something to be massaged to your benefit. There are no truths.
"The only power we have with China is massive trade," Trump said.
"I would tax China on products coming in. I would do a tariff, yes — and they do it to us.
"I would do a tax, and the tax, let me tell you what the tax should be... the tax should be 45%." He added that he was a believer in free trade, but that "it's got to be reasonably fair".
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/donald-trump-proposes-45-tariff-chinese-imports-1536711
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Neil Cavuto asks him about the 45 percent tariff comment, which was reported by the New York Times. "That's wrong. They were wrong. It's the New York Times, they're always wrong," Trump said. Times journalists who were present for the editorial meeting promptly took to twitter and pushed back:
Trump denies that he told the NY Times that he urged a 45% tariff on Chinese goods. Hm. I was there. He said it.
— Nicholas Kristof (@NickKristof) January 15, 2016
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/01/15/surprise-trump-flatout-lied-about-proposing-a-45-percent-tariff-in-china-n2105333You underestimate the utter stupidity and willing denial of reality of the typical Trump voter.
They’ll believe ANYTHING he says, and if it goes contrary to their already accepted beliefs, they’ll just pretend it actually somehow miraculously doesn’t.
They’re familiar enough with some of the more sordid stuff that happened (i.e. Lewinsky). But that’s because Bill Clinton was impeached over consensual sex. Younger people aren’t familiar with the truly arcane CT (i.e. Vince Foster) stuff that plagued the both of them for years.
if this bimbette doesnt think that the Clintons dont have a walmart trailer full of oppo research on the Dumpster, I have a bridge to sell Chris Christie.
She’s tight if she’s talking about Hillary between the ages of 0 to 10 ten years of age.
Otherwise, this bimbo was just hatched yesterday or really, really drunk for a long time.