Yes but it WON’T get under Clintons skin and they know it.
This was done for the MSM to have something to obsess on.
She will be FIRST ONE interviewed by EVERY NETWORK after the “debate” is over.
I will bet $100 on that.
Then they will interview the ex-SEAL who is pushing his book and spend the next two hours talking about those interviews. ANYTHING other than point out what a schmuck Trump is.
7 Likes
I’ll take that bet. The campaign wants their spinners out there front and center, and neither of them make for good spinners. Plus, much of the MSM is completely uncomfortable with the Benghazi mom and her attempts to blame Clinton for her son’s death. So, no, I don’t think either of them will be the sought after or an interview after the debate. Everyone knows exactly what they’re going to say and it’s tired and boring.
4 Likes
Fine and in the end,give em microphones and ask em why they are backing Trump.
Especially that gal who said that she wasn’t offended by Trump’s (or his surrogates) attacks on the Khan family.
1 Like
yeah, the talking heads are too busy after debates telling us what to think about them - no time for interviews of an audience that is not supposed to participate at all anyway.
1 Like
Hillary will look out into the audience, see his lineup, and know that she got under his skin, And then we’ll see a very big smile.
4 Likes
It’s too bad Walter Mondale in 1984 did not invite a Beirut bombing survivors family member, an AIDS victim, a small farmer displaced by big Agra business and a laid off factory worker.
4 Likes
There is a way to make the talking heads mean nothing:
GOTV.
Thankfully, there are people on the ground of that mindset. I am going to do what can. One thing about Profiles in Courage. Candy Crowley had hers in 2012. This current ghoulish rabble which call itself “journalists” manage to make both myself and Nate Silver alike:
Both of us believe that most are empty suits.
But Tweety observed, after Hill’s performance at the Commander In Chief Forum, that Hill did very well (she did).
THAT’s the real “low bar” in this election. Not Trump’s “passing grade”. Rather it is deciding that the MSM gameplan is wrong and one or more of the talking heads speaks the truth and demands the truth. Hey, it’s just a seven-figure-a-year job.
The country is a stake.
Whatever they do, I am eternally grateful to Candy Crowley.
5 Likes
“Do I hold her [Hillary Clinton] accountable? No. You know who I hold accountable is al-Sharia,” he said. “That’s who attacked them. That’s who killed the ambassador.” -Mark “Oz” Geist, ABC News January 2016.
7 Likes
These are the same people who believe Obama is a Fu Manchu level evil genius manipulating election results, government statistics and national demographics with aplomb while executing a diabolical plot to destroy America as we know it while simultaneously being a dull-witted puppet for unknown white people who has to read words he doesn’t really understand from a teleprompter.
His mind slid away into the labyrinthine world of doublethink. To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget, whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again, and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself — that was the ultimate subtlety; consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word ‘doublethink’ involved the use of doublethink.
5 Likes
Will Trump’s guests arrive separately or will they share a basket?
7 Likes
Do the Trump campaign ever do ANY fact checking?
The so-called grieving Benghazi mom? Her son didn’t die in the attacks in Benghazi. He died A YEAR EARLIER IN AFGHANISTAN.
Her own website dedicated to her son, which took me 0.6 seconds to find on Google
So what he’s doing here is yet again pushing the boundaries of whether anyone is going to fact check his sorry ass. It’s also giving this grifter mother (that Google search was VERY enlightening) another shot at some limelight. I weep for the memories of these soldiers sometimes. I get that death, especially unnatural or unnecessary ones, will warp people (have seen it up close in my own family). But to use it for your own gains and spotlight? I just can’t.
5 Likes
Hope someone sent that quote to the Clinton campaign. Although I’m sure they have it already.
1 Like
Gennifer, you’re fired! Haha, that was just Trump spew pre-handlers. Now they’ve found some women that aren’t labeled whores and can’t see past their ‘patriotism’.
Perfect HOsers.
Trump is playing small ball and is avoiding the reality of the debate staring at him. The audience is small peanuts, this is about knowledge and the display of it on demand.
Once the bell rings, it’s 90 minutes of going it solo, it’s no redos-mulligans or freebies.
So unless the Gold Star Hillary haters can beam in-depth answers to him via Morris code by batting their eyelashes, he’s in deep linguini.
Now, it’s just a circus.
I’m going to “watch” this tonight via Twitter, and watch those ON Twitter fact check in real time.
If they can do it, then perhaps it’s time for the media to seek refunds on those journalism degrees.
1 Like
Hillary should look at Trump’s guests and say “Mr. Trump, I commend you on the guests you’ve invited, but I don’t see any former POWs in the group. Oh, that’s right, you’ve already told everyone, you don’t like people that were caught.”
1 Like
It’s not a Benghazi mom. But still. This’ll just add to the shitshow.
Answer: “He tells it like it is”
Question: “And how is it?”
Answer: “What?”
6 Likes
Meanwhile Ivanka giving daddy a pre-Debate muscle relaxer
