" There’s a certain subset of anti-feminists whose main objection is to feminists’ tendency to fight harassment and violence against women. "
Name one. Name an anti-feminist whose main objection is femists tendency to fight harrassment and violenc eagainst women. In fact most Men’s Rights Activists acknowledge that there is violence agains women. They are constantly comparing the rate of such violence with the rate of similar violence against men, so they clearly acknowledge it.
" Even the name they usually adopt—“men’s rights activists”—is meant to imply victimhood."
No it’s a description of what they’re fighting for.
" They deny the existence of misogyny, instead claiming that “misandry” is the real issue. "
Name one MRA who has denied the existance of misogyny.
“Theirs is a world where “false accusations” are a real problem”
Yeah that world is called Earth, or did you miss the Duke rape case? Or the Banks case?
" while rape is not, "
Actually MRAs have been talking about rape being a problem for both sexes for a while now. Do you do ANY research?
" and men who are arrested for wife-beating were just defending themselves against violent women."
Again, MRAs have consistently said that domestic violence against women is a real problem and their own objection is the disproportionate attention given to it over domestic violence against men. I know of no MRA who says that men arrested for wife beating are all, or even mostly, defending themselves.
" which is why our culture has ridiculous phrases like “reverse racism” "
Which is ridiculous, but not for the reason you think.
"But Nungesser’s lawsuit inverts that claim, arguing that the real harassment is speaking out about rape and harassment. "
No he claims a real problem is false accusations, which is completely different from “speaking out about rape and harrassment”. He does not claim it’s the problem.
"But through efforts like this lawsuit, anti-feminists can distort the public image of the issue so it instead looks like a bunch of angry people pointing fingers at each other, with no way to distinguish between accusations and counter-accusations. "
Of course you can distinguish between accusations and counter-accusations you nitwit. As for “distoring the public image of the issue” it’s clear that the mattress girl did that.
“Which will lead a lot of people to throw up their hands and give up caring at all. Which is likely the point.”
No the point is to stop people ruining other people’s lives with false accusations. Really do you EVER do research?
