So let me see if I understand, anyone who is intelligent, has a deep knowledge of the Constitution and the law is a political adversary. That about cover it?
Itās as if Miss Armstrongās kindergarten class was running the government.
No kidding. Theyāre treating this like Yates just popped in and gave an opinion without any evidence to back it up. They had the ability to confirm what she told them. They didnāt care enough to bother doing so.
āI think if you flip the scenario and say, what if we just dismissed somebody because a political opponent of the President had made an utterance, you would argue that it was pretty irrational to act in that manner,ā Spicer said.
Gee, where have I seen this kind of thinking before?
"I donāt think that anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon, that they would try to use an airplane as a missile."
Oh yeah! THATāS where!!
I said for months⦠Donāt pick a fight with the press, you will absolutely not win.
These are people at the peak of a profession that combines the rigor of deductive logic, investigation, and being clever with words, and you think you can take on 50 of them at a time?
Thatād be impossible for the competent. Spicer is like if the average Brietbart reading internet troll was forced to actually debate the entire Harvard debate team at the same time⦠on something he was already waaaay on the wrong side ofā¦
Isnāt that just canonical GOP policy? Seems to me it isā¦
Fun fact time
Usually when youāre as paranoid as this administration its because you know youāre guilty.
Not to mention she has been there for 15 years through Republican and Democratic Administrations
A professional
A word that dare not be uttered anywhere near those dumbfuck Clampett grifters
Exactly, plus they didnāt want to fire Flynn anyway. In their opinion, he was doing nothing wrong. How could he be when, in many instances, it was benefiting them?
Besides, Obama told Trump not to use hi. Good enough reason right there.
Such assholes.
IOW, Sessions is not our Attorney General, but a Republican hack.
I donāt have a law degree, but I donāt think āwidely rumoredā would hold up in court.
āā¦a political opponentā¦ā
Self-fulfilling prophesy?
She probably would make a good political opponent of the GOP.
Smart, tough on crime, experience at the national level, a Southerner, telegenicā¦
And a hellava patriot.
Does she have any interest in electoral politics?
As Yates so cogently said, this is the Department of Justice. Itās not a law firm.
These people have to be stopped. I just saw this:
And wanting to guy Medicaid? Stop!!!
We could only wish. This is what we need . a consummate smart professional with no baggage.
But what rational person would subject themselves to the abuse you know ensues from a run
She might now.
But wait a secondā¦
If they didnāt believe her, then why was Bannon put on the NSC to keep an eye on Flynn? Because that was the reason that was given when he was removedā¦Flynn was no longer there, so they didnāt need Bannon to keep an eye on him.
Of course, the Bannon explanation was probably a lie itself. But I just think it needs to be pointed out, that their lies donāt even hold any internal consistency.
Her name is being bandied about as a potential Governor candidate in Georgia. Havenāt read anything from her confirming or denying any interest.
well now if your a Democrat. which we are not certain she is but if you are certainly you must be lying about collusion and treason. you canāt be an American patriot.this is very dangerous talk on its face. it need to be discussed. this is horrifying to think and accept. these reporters did not question this enough or properly. massive cover up of treason going on.