Discussion: Senate Witness: Rubio, Ryan Were Targets Of Russian Influence Attempts

To the extent that both Rubio and Ryan are FOR SALE and can be bought, paid for, and beholden, Putin was smart.

2 Likes

This can not be so. Just this morning the brilliant, great leader of Russia made a definitive statement on the issue of Russian involvement in the political processes of the United States and European counties.

“There was no Russian involvement.” There that should end the whole messy thing.

Little Donnie Trump has said repeatedly that Putin is a better leader than the leaders of the rest of the world with he possible exception of Little Donnie himself.

4 Likes

Probably didn’t make much of an effort vis-a-vis Rubio quickly figuring out that he wasn’t going anywhere and were probably surprised as he was that he was re-elected to the Senate.

1 Like

They’d already been trained and primed to be receptive to lies, xenophobia, and propaganda from decades of Father Coughlin, Birchers, Limbaugh, pre-Fox Murdoch media outlets, and Fox News.

8 Likes

Why Ryan now? Who gets helped by this? Just wondering. I can speculate too. But do all the threads in this Russia story belong to just one ball of yarn?

1 Like

As I said, listen to clip of the Senate testimony of Clint Watts. The Russians where targeting individual voters and running fake news to their social media streams. They had a sophisticated plan to hack our election; it was much bigger and more effective than I imagined.

Anyway, Hillary Clinton spent $640 million on her campaign; Jill Stein spent 3.5 million. You think it was Jill Stein who beat Hillary Clinton?

And why are you so concerned about third-party candidates getting a few votes? Do you hate democracy?

Word…

In Spades…

With a cherry on top…

5 Likes

You seriously believe that? Think about it. It is much easier to get a somebody to vote R or D that it is to get them to vote 3d party. The Russians aren’t stupid.

No, they are not: the fringe candidates got enough votes to swing the elections. Purpose served.

Putin has dirtied the name of Russia for at least another two generations.

2 Likes

Bingo! Since I have been following this angle very closely, mostly based on the work of Josh Marshall and Rachel Maddow, I have become convinced that Felix Sater is the key to the whole ugly business. And the real foundation for all of the hullabaloo and distraction is simply this: trump has been laundering dirty Russian Mob money for some time. The blackmail is based on this, and not on some perverted cavorting with Russian hookers. The grab-em-by-the-crotch tape didn’t do any real harm to the Donald’s campaign (although a number of women I know had bad memories re-activated by the news) so why should a peepee party in a Moscow hotel make any difference? But a federal crime with real hard time behind it, that is another thing altogether.

5 Likes

This Russian trolling wouldn’t work if your average Joe wasn’t so fucking stupid

3 Likes

Rubio: ”Within the last 24 hours, at 10:45 a.m. yesterday, a second attempt was made.”

And the vulnerability of Committee staff computers?

The White House has been hacked; the Pentagon has been hacked; the CIA has been hacked…

What’s to keep the Kremlin or WikiLeaks (but I repeat myself) from grabbing Senate investigative files?

And making a “special delivery” to Flynn, Manafort, Page, Stone, Bannon, Trump, Nunes, or anyone else?

6 Likes

I remember some press a while back about how the Trump team had used $200 million worth of targeted facebook ad buys to do exactly what Clint Watts is saying the Russians did. Did they both come up with the same brilliant plan independenty?

I think you could impeach Trump and go after the whole gang based on Clinton Watts’ testimony alone. He was eye opening. From his testimony, we got a clear picture of the extent of Russian interference complete with a ‘J’accuse!’ of Trump for actively using Russian disinformation for his own benefit against his opponents. However, even ‘J’accuse’ is too soft for what Watts did. Watts stated it as a matter of incontrovertible fact, and therefore the conspiracy can be inferred even without additional evidence of contacts. But when you then piece together the sheer number of contacts, and the timing of certain disinfo articles, the conspiracy is basically confirmed.

Next, when you start to follow the money, the conspiracy becomes even more high stakes. This is a big deal. If guys like Rubio and Ryan have any sense of ambition or brains at all, they will go after Trump to get him out of there.

2 Likes

I think that Trump got more votes than Clinton in enough swing states to win the Electoral College.

And how do you explain all the Democratic candidate Senate losses? Those are Jill Stein’s fault, too, right?

And follow the murders, too.

“‘Follow the trail of dead Russians’ if you want to crack 2016 election interference: Senate intel witness”

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/follow-the-trail-of-dead-russians-if-you-want-to-crack-2016-election-interference-senate-intel-witness/

While we’re putting on the tinfoil, let’s note that the distance between Putin and Rupert has not always been that large. “The enemy of my enemy” is a dangerous game to get sucked into.

1 Like

It would be amusing to say the least to trace each Russian hack to a Trump comment or Breitbart article trashing other candidates within the same day or even hour. Say Marco gets hacked but lo and behold at the debate Trump calls him “Little Marco”. It just seems too convenient.

1 Like

So let me see if I have this right - you think the Russians did things during the election but the election was still fair and Hillary lost fair and square in the EC?

Those are two competing views of the same situation.

Either the election was fair and honest or it wasn’t and clearly it wasn’t. So clearly she didn’t lose those votes because her campaign or her lack or warmth or Bernie’s awesomeness. It was obviously a lot of illegality and we still don’t know the full extent.

So stop with the “she lost” shit and then getting in on the conversation about the election being thrown by Trump and the Russians.

3 Likes

They didn’t need to get a lot of people to vote 3rd party and this election featured two candidates. It was 2000 all over again with even more people duped and/or just plain stupid. And, as with the 9/11 terror attacks, the Russians didn’t actually need to hack any voting machines and they probably intended all along to be discovered as the uncertainty it will generate from here forward is far more damaging than any actual “vote stealing.” This is the true Red Threat imagined by McCarthy, except that the damage is actual and, perhaps, much broader.

2 Likes