Discussion for article #235126
NOThing IS moRE threATEning than a BLACK man RUNNIng away FRom you. THat POLice must HAve been scared FOR his LIFE!1!!!one!!1!!!
āWe must come together as a community, as a state, and as a nation in working to bring our communities together and rebuild trust.ā
What? This sounds like the beginnings of a good word salad. How about we come together as a nation to address runaway police brutality? There will be no trustānoneāunless this issue is dealt with head on. And, you, sir, are in a very good position to help lead ā if you so choose. Thank you.
Calling the shooting of someone in the back āavoidableā doesnāt sit right in my mind.
āReprehensibleā makes more sense.
Oh, I donāt think youāre giving this statement its due: it is, after all, coming from the GOPās Chamber Tim. Yes, itās so heavily conditioned and qualified you can hear the invocation of āSorry for saying thisā and āPardon me for commenting at allā and āExcuse me if Iām overstepping my boundsā with such a level of frequency as is rarely witnessed outside of Canada, but itās still amazing that he had the timerity to say anything even remotely resembling the possibility of a mild criticism.
Tim may be in big trouble, did he get the OK from massa to comment on this?
Scott, our senator āappointedā by our harridan governor, is an absolute waste of Senate space and oxygen in general. Yeah, it was āavoidable!ā You thinkā¦?
āRebuild trustā is a euphamism for āit starts with the Black community-not the polce departmentsā. They will be the LAST entities Blacks will trust.
WTF? Avoidable? No this cop murdered a man and lied to cover it up. This cop should be facing the death penalty for what he did.
ā¦ and heās already assuming the protests will involve violence.
Hard to believe the GOPās token black is speaking out considering how voiceless he was on Ferhguson.
Shorter Scott: If blacks would just trust Whitey more, all this could have been avoided.
The video will not be admissable evidenceā¦
The cop will walk.
Rather than calling the video āAvoidableā he should have called the video āhorrificā or ādeeply troubling.ā That certainly would have been more appropriate.
I could never be a cop. First, Iād prolly shoot pedophiles on sight. Second, I wouldnāt pull over speeders unless they were doing like 30 over. Third, if some dude I pulled over for a busted tail light ran from me, Iād prolly admire his determination and initiative and let him roam for a while.
Also, donuts tend to give me heartburn.
LOL WUT?
Please explain the specific evidentiary exclusion by which this video would be suppressed.
Ferguson didnāt have video of the capping.
There isnāt anything about the tape that is inadmissible. In the hands of a competent prosecutor it gets in and the cop goes down. The officer will cop a plea.
I am just as interested in his partner who had to know what he had just done and that he was covering things up. If she lied, she might need to be charged with murder as well. At least as an accessory.
It was wise of the witness to hand his video over to the murdered victims family and of the family to turn it over to the news media - it would have never seen the light of day otherwise.
If this hadnāt been filmed and handled the above way it was it would have just been another ājustified killingā by a policeman.
He is going to get primaried no matter what, he should be willing to show more backbone.