Discussion: SCOTUS Keeps Immigration Case On Track For Decision Before 2016 Election

Discussion for article #243322

The court, of course, has the jurisdiction to delay the process at any step of the way.

So even with a seemingly optimistic timeline…the entire process can still all go to shit with useless delays and overtime. Nuff said.

I’d say, Not quite nuff said. I think the SCOTUS has determined as a group it’s knows enough on “urgency” and on the issues at play. I DOD accept your emphasis on Tierney Sneed’s caution: the SCOTUS doesn’t agree on a whole lot, but it does agree that it doesn’t want IT to be made out as a proxy battlefield during a presidential election.

If the SCOTUS were delay RELEASE of its decision until after next November’s election, that would be inconsisent with whatever we can take in the way of policy from recent SCOTUS behavior, yet actually not be unlawful. Stll - if they didn’t do that in the Obamacare challenge in 2012, it doesn’t seem likely they’ll go that way on immigration.

The administration is going to win this one, but I’m not convinced anyone - other than those who actually ‘liked’ Roe v Wade - will like HOW that win looks. If the decision gets cobbled together from matching up a more-or-less uniform position on behalf of the 4 liberals with a conservative decision with or without one vote in support of that technical dissent, with a uniform view from the 3 most reflexively conservative bank of Alito, Scalia & Thomas, I think it’d be hard to believe some new problems won’t replace the existing ones - yet, that’s the most likely scenario.

4 Likes

I agree — Unless " a " particular justice just decides it’s time to vent a little past frustration — Wouldn’t put it past " him " —

Oh noes, this might cast a bad light on the Republican Party and their gargantuan efforts to win over their despised neighbors, Oh noes!

There are some Mexicans that vote ÂŽ and a few blacks-like 3 and I think they are all either current or past Presidential candidates, and a handful Asians, more women than I can believe and the same goes for the log cabin gays but the facts are, all of the vast majority of all of these groups despises the Repub Party with or without them adding in new hate.
The Democrats might as well keep pushing these issues in front of the Repubs, it gives them the opportunity to renew their racial biases and hone their lying skills.
Issue Executive order after executive order and let the Republicans go wild fighting them, even if we lose-we win and that’s the shit.

The issue, from my understanding, really won’t be about immigration, but rather upon the Executive Branch’s ability to prioritize its workload and determine how to apply its resources, both of which have long standing precedents supporting the President’s position.

And viewed through that prism, it makes it more difficult for conservatives to line up against this case, as they aren’t tying Obama’s hands in any meaningful way, but they ARE tying the hands of all future Presidents…including republican ones.

1 Like

This is exactly it. That’s why the administration is sure they’ll win this and why they agreed to allow the states to have a small delay under agreement Verilli won’t file a response.

I think this is true, but I don’t think they care or have really considered it. The Republicans haven’t been very good with the long game lately. They go for directly scored points NOW. We see this in how they’ve dealt with everything from the evangelicals to the tea party. It’s all turning on the master, but it got them elections for a short while.

1 Like