Discussion for article #246816
I wonder if Roberts, in an effort to avoid 4-4 ties, will lean more progressive. For the good of the Institution.
Or maybe he just knows that the US electorate does not need mercury to make it ‘mad as a hatter’…
…and Constitution, as well as burnishing his legacy.
In 3, 2, 1… activist unelected SC Justice strikes again…
He has children, they were very young when he was elevated to the Supreme Court.
This is, although the story does not say it, Roberts acting as Circuit Justice. It is not a decision of the whole court.
Josh and Team TPM - let’s get the headlines right. Chief Justice Roberts didn’t do ANYTHING. The Court declined to step in. The headlines is inapt. Sorry, but as a lawyer this sort of thing annoys me, and it has nothing to do with the merits of the case or how one may feel about CJ Roberts.
TPM headlines are routinely misleading.
The framers LOVED mercury. They put it in everything – on their breakfast cereal, in eggs, used it as a poultice for minor scrapes and burns. This shit never woulda flown if Scalia had still been around to reinforce an originalist reading of the Constitution.
With Scalia gone, I’m already breathing easier.
Its costs? Who gives a fuck how much it will cost? No one wants to be breathing mercury.
or maybe he will just grudgingly do his job…
LOL!
but, sadly quite true… Mercury probably would have killed Lincoln before Booth got to him if someone hadn’t intervened.
OK, let’s be honest and do a rewrite…
“the EPA should have considered the costs and benefits before imposing limits on corporate profits”
…the poison was inconsequential.
Well, he did do something, just not what the headlines suggest. He, in his capacity as Circuit Justice, denied a request to stay the EPA regulations. It wasn’t a decision on the merits though, and it remains to be seen how things will play out along the way.
But, it is a victory for the EPA and Obama, which is the point the OP was making about today being a good day.