previously
just sayin/future?
These are not mutually exclusive things…
-
Rich GOP donors in NJ are sexual-predator-loving jerkwads that won’t support:
a: A woman
b: A woman who criticized Dear Leader -
The RNC is chock full of sexual-predator-loving jerkwads that won’t support:
a: A woman
b: A woman who criticized Dear Leader
These can be true even if the party is underwater in NJ and the current whale of a governor is beached at 15% approval…
2 Likes
Though it will be due to healthcare, Trump sponsored retribution is on the horizon.
1 Like
Republicans getting what they deserve. It’s all good.
3 Likes
As long as she and the Party of Christie and Trumpp loses, who gives two flying figs who they try to pass blame on to.
She’s going down, and has already been down according to Whitman.
So, we have an unnamed source in the RNC claiming that a female candidate in an eastern state lost donations based specifically on criticizing the sexual conduct of one of the most unpopular presidents in history.
On face value, that sounds pretty fliimsy.
2 Likes
“[The President] is unhappy with anyone who neglected him in his hour of need,” the unnamed source said, adding: “Christie was not as stalwart as some people in the party, but at least he didn’t go against him the way she did.”
Using the term “stalwart” in the sense of “craven bootlicking toady”, I see.
2 Likes
It’s Hard out Here for a Pimp
1 Like
Whatever the chill on donors not wanting to back a loser, the report that “an unnamed ‘insider within the RNC’s top leadership’ told NJ.com that Guadagno may be suffering financially due to her criticism of Trump” lets all comers know that Trumpistas have their hand on the National party’s purse strings, and they’re enforcing Dear Leader’s wishes over any other considerations.
2 Likes
Anything related to Christie in NJ is poisonous.