Discussion for article #230395
Thatâs niceâŚdoes this mean youâll block any and all attempts to overturn the orders if they arenât in line in some way with the orders?
Youâve got his back? Since when?
As he was seen running at full speed away from the president along with the other cowardly dems.
Good. Then get on national TV, even if you have to hip check McCain and Graham to do so, and make some noise.
Thatâd be a first.
âReid: âWe told the president, and weâre telling him in front of the TV cameras: Weâve got his back.ââ
This reminds me a little of that scene from âSupermanâ where Superman is flying with Lois Lane and he says âDonât worry, I got youâ and she replies âYeah, but whoâs got you?â
The president will be with Reid in Nevada on Friday, and below is what Reid said in a statement. Also promising their support are Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Senate Democratic leadership. .
âThis is personal to me,â Mr. Reid said in a statement, adding that he has been disappointed that Republicans have âducked, dodged and skirtedâ taking up legislation, forcing Mr. Obama to act administratively. âThere is no better place than Nevada for President Obama to outline the actions he is taking.â
Do you mean if Harry doesnât say it on TV it doesnât count? What if heâs on the record in print in the letter he and other Democratic leaders sent to the President giving their support? The dog whistle in this item was too subtle for me, I guess.
Excerpt from HuffPo
Reid and other top Senate Democrats sent the president a letter on Monday saying they stand behind him on executive action, including for parents of DACA recipients, U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents.
Yep⌠way back.
I took that comment to mean that Reid et al. should start getting far, far more aggressive in pushing to balance the presence of GOP voices on TV, in the places most people get their news. Something I think we all agree has long been desperately needed.
Sorry, but I think the republicans are a bunch of seditious traitors who wonât stop until theyâve
destroyed this country.
Thatâs what I meant. I am not sure what the âdog whistleâ was.
Reading between the linesâŚ
We standing behind him
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay behind him.
Obama drops immigration EO and you switch your demeanor. Well - we donât believe you, you need more people!
Reidâs not the enemy, we know who is, but this article has incited people to go after him like he is. Heâs not my Senator, but for him to go on TV as much as other Senators do and say whatever you think he should say still doesnât get the job done. With 36.3% of the country not turning out to vote and with only MSNC and Univision carrying this most important speech of the presidentâs, weâre dealing with apathy of the worst kind. Reidâs not going to change that.
TPM regularly publishes articles which subtly but surely encourage commentators to take out after the subject, in this case Reid. The information is incomplete and weâre all wishing we still had a majority in the Senate. Nevada had a 31.8% voter turnout, so nobody there much cares about Reid or the future. Blame him because heâs a convenient target.
He has to be invited to appear on TV first. And as we know, GOPers like McCain and Graham always get the invitations first from the MSM.
I wasnât going after Reid, and I hardly think heâs the only one we need to see more of in venues most people see (hence my âet al.â). And this is very much connected to our low-turnout problem, which partly traces to the Dems-run-away-from-Obama-and-their-own-accomplishments thing, but also â hugely â from our awful, awful political âreportingâ that sees, eg, clips of 2 GOP senators passionately (and falsely) asserting that Obamaâs expected order is unconstitutional and ignores their desire to work with him as perfectly âbalancedâ by the reporterâs telling us the Administration says thatâs not true (NBC, last night). The media universe weâre trapped in is the product of 40 years of concerted ref-working by the right to turn the âliberal mediaâ into what they are today; that makes it that much harder for Dems â and facts â to be heard by most of the country, but that much more important that Dems be as aggressive as humanly possible about getting heard. Literally nothing more important, because everything else depends on it.