Discussion: Rand Paul: Obama Has 'Conflict Of Interest' In Appointing SCOTUS Nominee

Discussion for article #246035

That reasoning is more circular than the synthetic fibers on top of his head.

65 Likes

So, he doesn’t recognize his own conflict of interests that are identical? He has policy positions. Guess he shouldn’t ever make an executive decision…oh, wait, that’s never going to be an issue, so I guess the problem solves itself…

36 Likes

Say what? Me thinks he has been bowing down to the herbal god of his college days.

14 Likes

Rand Paul opens mouth: stupid falls out.

53 Likes

Wow. This guy really is as dumb as they come.

28 Likes

Earth to Rand: Coal is dead, get over it.

21 Likes

16 Likes

The main conflict of interest is how that dead squirrel stapled to his head stays on.

7 Likes

Maybe it’s time to cancel all future nominations to the Supreme Court - just shut it down.

Maybe it’s time to cancel future elections.

Let’s just tear up the US Constitution. With Republicans taking away women’s rights, voting rights, and the President’s defined authority, it’s time for a people’s revolution!

16 Likes

“Because there are cases challenging policies of the administration” would apply to pretty much every Supreme Court nomination in history, you moron. Or is this one of those special reasons that applies only to black presidents?

64 Likes

I doubt the man could be even this creative.
His staff must have brainstormed into the night to come up with this doozy.

6 Likes

Wait, you guys lifted this from the Onion, right?

30 Likes

And of course the next president will have no interest in decisions on executive power.

23 Likes

The Executive Branch has had SOMETHING at stake, something being contested or litigated, something working its way through the courts EVERY GODDAMNED TIME A PRESIDENT HAS NOMINATED A CANDIDATE FOR A JUSTICE POSITION ON SCOTUS!!
Republicans are fricking nuts.

24 Likes

And Senators do, too.

Congratulations, dipshit. You’ve actually said the dumbest thing so far.

18 Likes

In this particular case, I’m going to have to go with “dumber than a box of rocks” rather than “nuts.” Usually, it’s both/and, but this is “wipes drool off chin” level stupid.

26 Likes

This guy is a moron!! But then we are going to hear all sorts of GOP wing nut reasons for why the president shouldn’t be allowed to nominate Scalias replacement

9 Likes

Tell Paul that his claim is dump stupid: The President of the United States cannot possibly be in conflict with the laws that he’s sworn to uphold and defend!

3 Likes

Perhaps Randa can show us the “conflict of interest clause” in the section of the Constitutional dealing with the Presidential power of appointment.

25 Likes