Discussion for article #246035
That reasoning is more circular than the synthetic fibers on top of his head.
So, he doesn’t recognize his own conflict of interests that are identical? He has policy positions. Guess he shouldn’t ever make an executive decision…oh, wait, that’s never going to be an issue, so I guess the problem solves itself…
Say what? Me thinks he has been bowing down to the herbal god of his college days.
Rand Paul opens mouth: stupid falls out.
Wow. This guy really is as dumb as they come.
Earth to Rand: Coal is dead, get over it.
The main conflict of interest is how that dead squirrel stapled to his head stays on.
Maybe it’s time to cancel all future nominations to the Supreme Court - just shut it down.
Maybe it’s time to cancel future elections.
Let’s just tear up the US Constitution. With Republicans taking away women’s rights, voting rights, and the President’s defined authority, it’s time for a people’s revolution!
“Because there are cases challenging policies of the administration” would apply to pretty much every Supreme Court nomination in history, you moron. Or is this one of those special reasons that applies only to black presidents?
I doubt the man could be even this creative.
His staff must have brainstormed into the night to come up with this doozy.
Wait, you guys lifted this from the Onion, right?
And of course the next president will have no interest in decisions on executive power.
The Executive Branch has had SOMETHING at stake, something being contested or litigated, something working its way through the courts EVERY GODDAMNED TIME A PRESIDENT HAS NOMINATED A CANDIDATE FOR A JUSTICE POSITION ON SCOTUS!!
Republicans are fricking nuts.
And Senators do, too.
Congratulations, dipshit. You’ve actually said the dumbest thing so far.
In this particular case, I’m going to have to go with “dumber than a box of rocks” rather than “nuts.” Usually, it’s both/and, but this is “wipes drool off chin” level stupid.
This guy is a moron!! But then we are going to hear all sorts of GOP wing nut reasons for why the president shouldn’t be allowed to nominate Scalias replacement
Tell Paul that his claim is dump stupid: The President of the United States cannot possibly be in conflict with the laws that he’s sworn to uphold and defend!
Perhaps Randa can show us the “conflict of interest clause” in the section of the Constitutional dealing with the Presidential power of appointment.