âBe carefulâ, OR WHAT, PRIEBUS? They are over-reaching before they even reach. IIRC, the ethics director merely offered a âfriendly reminderâ of the actual legal guidelines. Why should that be an issue?
When even milquetoast wussies like Priebus are emboldened to make vague threats like this, the Republicans have jumped the shark. And ТŃŃПпâs not even sworn in yet.

Liked x 1000
It worked for the W administration because people were shocked and scared after the attacks on September 11th.
This looks like weakness, not strength.
No, my original point is that the quote is about âthat documentâ should never have been in the briefing, which is implying that the Buzzfeed doc made up the intel in the briefing. I have seen this implied elsewhere. My point is that what was reported was a 2 page summary of the evidence found by the intelligence agencies. This intelligence is related to, but certainly from additional sources and checked out to certain standards, not simply copied and pasted from the Buzzfeed doc.
Thanks for clarifying. It was my understanding the sources were the same and some of the same material was part of the briefing.
Perhaps not.
Have no fear. Laurence Tribe et al. will figure it out toot sweet. In fact, I suspect he and his group of attorneys â the same group of top-of-the-line attorneys that offered to defend Trumpâs sexual assault accusers for free â already have.
I fully expect that lawsuits will be filed as soon as the courthouse doors open on Jan. 23. Hell, it wouldnât surprise me if there are filings next Friday afternoon, which would be particularly sweet, if for no other reason to read the DrumpfTweets⢠claiming that a bunch of legal eagles were trying to rain on his parade.
The legal shitâs going to hit the fan, to be sure. And the fireworks are going to be spectacular!
And as far as the Buzz Feed allegations go, the IC would NOT even mention them to Comrade Coir Coif if there wasnât some serious concerns there. After all, people throw crap at the Orange Shitgibbon every day but the IC doesnât brief him on those things now, do they? Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
In a way, it almost seemed like a shot across the bow. Sort of like saying, âThereâs stuff out there, buddy, and somebody will get it.â And the more he attacks the ICâs credibility the sooner it will come out.
Iâve been seeing lots of reports that Intelligence Communities around the globe are looking into Chris Steeleâs compilation of reports and that there are numerous other allegations âout thereâ that havenât surfaced, at least in public. If nothing else, we may have to rely on international agencies forcing the FBIâs hand on investigations because, if Steele is any indication, if they remain recalcitrant - a very real possibility under Comey and the NYC office - these external groups may decide to go right to the press instead.
As with Watergate, the cover-up is always worse than the underlying crime. âFollow the moneyâ!
Is that official?
Donât think itâs out of the realm of possibility for PeePee to manufacture or allow a 9/11-type event to occur early in his âpresidencyâ. Showmen love theatrics, especially cheap thrills. Whatâs a few thousand dead Americans if it locks him into power? Whatâs a few hundred thousand dead, for that matter?
Just liked the idea of this⌠#cheaptheater
And donât you get the sense that they know full well Peepee wonât last long? Once heâs gone and Pence assumes office, Pence will basically be an immediate lame duck with very little power. There will be anger on all sides with Democrats railing against him and the Deplorables screaming from the right that they didnât vote for him. If it happens before Election Day in 2018, Democrats might do a whole lot better than anyone expects.
Thereâs a thing you and @tiowally are alluding to that seriously interests me, and thatâs the lack of clarity about that dossier. Itâs seriously discomfited the entire globe, because it lays the worst-case scenario out there in black and white. So many entities who feel especially discomfited have seized on the âunverifiedâ aspect to do a lot of harrumphing and pooh-poohing and so forth. But hereâs the thingâunverified means just that. It was assembled not by some credulous scandalmonger but by a former employee of MI6 whoâs respected in the intelligence community here. Itâs raw intelligence, not confirmed. But itâs not dismissible, not garbage. Itâs damn serious stuff.
A couple of days ago William Saletan of Slate wrote a piece that started out with his saying he did not âbelieveâ that Trump colluded with the Russians. But he goes on to say, point by point, that Trump is acting like he had colluded for reasons Saletan doesnât understand. My own belief is Saletan used the word âbelieveâ in the sense of accepting as true without proof. I donât either, because the thing isnât proven. But I think about four-fifths of the world is, like Saletan, wondering what in the hell Trump is playing at if he didnât collude with Putin. Is he being the worldâs biggest patsy just because Putin said he was âcolorfulâ and Trump thinks that means âgeniusâ because of a mistranslation? I suppose thatâs possible, if unlikely. Is it because Trump genuinely wants to improve relations? Thatâs pretty far-fetched.
So we come back to the dossier, and a whole series of statements and actions from Trump and others that canât be well explained without the collusion aspect. No proof. A near insurmountable, and certainly not ignorable, pile of suspicion. And five days to go until Trump becomes President.
Itâs palpable, like when you know itâs going to snow. Iâll bet every single person in the GOP leadership has talked to his lawyer and has a plan for when it all goes south.
Remember how he came out of that particular briefing and made a point to proclaim how great the Intel Community is? They hit a nerve and scared the crap outta him. But it didnât last long. Iâd bet that someone - Bannon or Guiliani - told him that âthey wouldnât dare!â and his own ego wouldnât allow him to remain grateful for the info he was given so he went back to attacking them.
This insane egotistical posturing of his will be his downfall. I will pop a bottle of Dom Perignon when August 9, 1974 Part Deux comes.
(edited because suggesting Nov '63 was wrong⌠even I have a conscience)
I just had to lob out there that we still have the batshit-crazy NPD element in play and what might appear the obvious course of events may be thrown quite a ways off by this.
My only certainty is that Trump will not have a normal Presidency. Itâll unravel somehow. Thatâs the whatâI just hope most of us survive the how.
The unraveling has started. What remains to be seen is how long his handlers can hold him together. Bungee cords and duct tape.
Reincey is feeling his oats, which I assume means his balls.