Though ‘45’ attempted to do just that, no one has straight up done it, soooo
3 Likes
And they fire multiple times as well
3 Likes
Apparently her evidence is that she was with Trump all day and therefore knows he didn’t write it. Dowd is saying he sent to WH Social Media guy. Then when asked for email, said he had dictated it, so no paper trail. It’s just blatant lying. And it is irrelevant if the House and Senate won’t act. That’s the absolute most important reason to change Congress. We gotta get rid of these idiots.
13 Likes
Or, since trump is morphing into becoming more Nixonian every day, how about “That statement is no longer operative.”
8 Likes
Just realized who Walter Shaub is —former head of Government Ethics
9 Likes
The day a POTUS acts upon the belief that a President can’t obstruct justice, and the Supreme Court upholds that action, is the day I move to another country. Period.
14 Likes
I had just hopped on to say that if you see nothing wrong with the credibility and competency of Trump’s doctor, then you’ll see nothing wrong with the credibility and competency of Trump’s lawyers, and it’s all just a conspiracy to disenfranchise the (minority of the…) voters.
Ship o’ fools.
6 Likes
“… Has A History Of ‘Ludicrous’ Assertions…”
If that’s true – a history – it suggests he’s an incompetent.
One aspect of lawyer-like competence is measured public statements.
8 Likes
Lawyers can and do say anything they think will help their clients; until they show up in court. Keep talking, counselor, you’re doing a fine job of proving your client’s guilt.
10 Likes
. . . a department made redundant in 2017.
5 Likes
…at the same time the department name became an oxymoron.
6 Likes
Is the president above the law?
Not according to Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution.
The text requires the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” This clause, known as the Take Care Clause, requires the President to enforce all constitutionally valid Acts of Congress, regardless of his own Administration’s view of their wisdom or policy. It seems to make it clear that a presidential action that prevents (or obstructs) the faithful execution of existing law would be illegal—and in violation of the Constitution.
It seems to also imply that the appointment of officials who are on record as opposing the enforcement of said laws, such as the Consumer Protection Act or the EPA, could be considered a violation—and therefore an impeachable offense.
12 Likes
Typical Trump communication with the public:
Dec. 4, 2017, 10 AM (EST) (Trump holds a news conference): Let me repeat, I had a tremendous meeting with Michael Flynn and he told me he’d lied to the FBI about several tremendously important and sensitive national security matters. Of course, I fired him about 90 days later for lying to the FBI and to Mike Pence. I then asked FBI Director Comey to not go after Flynn in any way. Comey declined my request, so he was fired, by me, the president of the United States.
Dec. 4, 2017, 10:30 AM (EST) (to a reporter): I have never ever said I met with Michael Flynn and I did not fire him because he lied to the FBI. I barely know Michael Flynn other than he worked briefly as some sort of adviser to my tremendously beautiful, amazingly successful campaign, which led to me winning the general election by the biggest margin in history. I never asked Director Comey to drop the Flynn investigation because Flynn did nothing unlawful. I did not fire Mr. Comey, he resigned because he knew he was unfit for the job.
7 Likes
More like irrelevant
3 Likes
Like large shrimp.
4 Likes
not or no longer needed or useful; superfluous.
3 Likes
Jumbo Shrimp
6 Likes
Luckily for us 
1 Like
I hope the appropriate Bar Association is taking the necessary actions to disbar John Dowd. Subverting official channels of communications, Impersonating and trying to incriminate the POSUS in a crime are all egregious crimes.
5 Likes
You were too kind.
8 Likes