That’s totally untrue. The report when out on the radio, and he realized they matched the description, and he backed up. What the police said was that Brown specifically was not mentioned by name as the suspect. Sheeesh.
Seems conservatives and extreme liberals are just clueless on the evidence.
That’s just false, he got the call and in fact backed up when he realized Brown and Johnson matched the description of the suspects. You’d make a good FOX talk show host based on your ability to just make stuff up.
Actually the people who never changed their story all said he was coming toward Wilson. It’s the one’s who said he was surrendering, shot in the back, shot while on the ground pleading “don’t shoot”, etc., that not only changed their stories, but in fact many later admitted they did not actually even see the incident, they just repeated what they heard. All this is in the documents released, and the Grand Jury heard ALL the testimony from ALL the witnesses.
McComments, you must be looking at different stuff than what he said when he was interviewed. He was pretty clear that the robbery didn’t have anything to do with the encounter.
I don’t need to give you a quote. There are several of us saying the same thing. I think we watched the same interview. I think you need to provide us your source.
With the initial encounter when he told them to get off the street, yes, correct. Then when he drove off and looked in the mirror he realized they matched the description of the suspects in the strong arm robbery.
“The group, made up of current and former law enforcement officials and military who pledge to defend the Constitution”
The group, made up of current and former law enforcement officials and military who had hoped for an opportunity to relive their glory days of shooting brown people…
FIFY
BTW, Anonymous needs to get on the ball and start releasing more of those KKK identities…I’m more than certain the Oath Keepers will be shown to harbor its own share.
Wilson realizes that Michael Brown matches the market theft suspect’s description
“When I start looking at Brown, first thing I notice is in his right hand, his hand is full of cigarillos. … I backed up just past them and then angled my vehicle, the back of my vehicle, to kind of cut them off, kind of keep them somewhat contained. As I’m opening the door, he turns, faces me, looks at me and says, ‘What the (expletive) are you going to do about it?’ and shuts my door, slammed it shut.”
Done. Now show me your quote please. Or did you read it on a blog on a “cool website”?
Wilson did know about the robbery report. Dorian Johnson admitted he and Brown robbed the shop. Wilson in fact did call for backup. Eyewitnesses testified to the Grand Jury in fact over a dozen that Brown attacked Wilson not once but twice.
The fact of the matter is, if you look at the PBS chart, there’s a column missing: witness race.
Once you add that column, you have enough information for understanding why a vastly white grand jury considered the majority of witnesses not to be credible on certain issues.
There was no such thing as an Oath"keeper" until the Marxist, Leninist, Trotskyist, Maoist, Titoist, Hugochavezist, Castroist, Hitlerist, Combination FascistCommunistKenyanIndonesian Usurper came along…who is both pitifully weak and unable to do the job and incompetent and at the same time a raging dictator who is brute-force destroying America, 12 times a day.
In other words, as soon as “Fake America” elected the NiCLANG on promises to give ObamaYachts to all the Blah People, suddenly there were Oath"keepers", “Patriots”, “Tea Parties”, “Constitutionalists”, and the rest of the kooks all over the place.
It is absolutely nothing but “we hate NiCLANGs”, period and full-stop.