No one was supposed to notice that. Conservatives would appreciate that even more, but then they don’t ‘get’ irony. Kind of sad, in a way…
I can’t say that any of the important talkers have brought it up. I’m sure they’ll catch on eventually.
Me too of course. It’s just morbid curiosity. I think it’s silly to click and then yell at TPM for having Sarah Palin stories. If you’re not interested, just prove it by not clicking. It’s counterproductive to click and yell. It just drives up the back-end metrics and prolongs the agony. Sarah’s done, she’ll never be a force in politics again, full stop. No need to yell at TPM about her. In a few more years you won’t hear about her from one year to the next. There are already columnists who have a policy of not mentioning her.
The screencap at the top of the article in particular - just perfect!
Don’t tell me that someone hasn’t gone out of their way to find that particular frame.
I’m OK with that, just sayin…don’t pretend you’re not!
She has hit the proverbial wall. Who is Rich Lowry of National Review going to masturbate to now?
Gnarly Fiorina
Nixon in 1963. Look it up and also look up what happened.
Every repig everywhere wants this yutz to be president. Make no mistake-they hate the country and would rather see it burn than let the Democrats win. If you think it’s not possible, you are wrong: Nixon in 1963, St. Ronnie anytime, GW Bush the coke-hoovering monkeyboy. …no body thought the repigs were going to nominate them, either.
In Concord, NH…the idiot didn’t even get the state right. Perfect repig.
Yikes! Those crazy, jittery eyes!
for a “failed grifter”, ms. palin seems to be doing pretty well. not that I disagree with you, regarding who really cares what she has to say, but somebody must, she kicks enough ratings points to continue being paid attention to by the actual media. they wouldn’t do this if she didn’t bring viewers with her.