Oh, yeah, that’s right. Thanks for reminding me about the photo of Obama w/ Farrakahan from 100 years ago all of a sudden resurfacing. I agree, something is up.
Both siderism at it’s most obvious.
Oh, yeah, that’s right. Thanks for reminding me about the photo of Obama w/ Farrakahan from 100 years ago all of a sudden resurfacing. I agree, something is up.
Both siderism at it’s most obvious.
So now, retroactively, firing and permanent shunning is the only acceptable punishment for sexual harassment by people not named trump?
It sounds as if he harassed someone, he was punished and sent to counseling, then later he harassed one or more other people and was fired for it. Without a Bush-like ability to see into someone’s soul (ahem) that sounds pretty much like a reasonable course of events.
Of course, you can argue that politicians and their campaign should never hire or retain creepy assh*les, but that rule would pretty much empty both campaign offices and corporate america.
Let us not make any judgements until we hear the unbiased opinion of Maureen Dowd who, hopefully, has come down from her pot brownie high by now.
The New York Times:
“All the What-Aboutism That Fits On Page One.”
Why would she know enough to fire a sexual abuser when she’s married to one?
Note from the article this “Faith Advisor” was a multiple offender, just like Bill.
I guess Obama is going to have to go out before the media and make another impassioned and informed speech concerning race like after the media reported all the hoodoo about Reverend Wright.
Oh, that’s right - Obama isn’t running for President or residing in the White House anymore, is he?
Senior Adviser for Faith Based Operations
No kidding.
How long til this kind of stuff starts costing TPM money?
Yeah, you would think that after serially sexually harassing over 30 women and having an affair with a porn star while she was pregnant with his child, Hillary would have left him, prenup agreement be damned.
Oh, wait…
Of course the NYT had to run this up the flag pole to “balance” their story on Trump… or something.
Sure, but Hillary had a way to make her own money.
Melania probably can’t unless shes’ on her back, and people who throw that kind of money around are going to find something younger, and probably more human looking.
Yeah, you would think, wouldn’t you?
Anyway, this story is from the New York Times, and they hate Hillary.
Didn’t see that you already provided a link to the GOP casino perv, but we can never have too many links to stories about the moral and upstanding members of the Republican Party.
And whoever is Steve Wynn’s plastic surgeon really needs to have his license revoked by the Nevada Medical Association. His face looks like it was modeled after the rejected makeup tests for the zombies on “The Walking Dead”.
Thank God the NYT is back doing what they do best! They were starting to lose their focus talking about this Trump stuff.
As do you it seems.
Hillary Clinton is the gift that keeps on giving…to republicans.
Maggie Haberman.
Please, don’t infer that Melania married Donald just for his money. Why, I am sure that a great majority of women would be attracted to a poor or middle-class 300 lb. orange asshole with a substandard IQ and man boobs the size of Jupiter.
But they will no doubt turn over their op-ed page on Sunday to Trump supporters views on Hillary firing a guy after he was again accused of sexual harassment after he got counseling the first time some complained the first time.
If you say her name 3 times, Beetlejuice dies.