Discussion: Nope! White House Falsely Claims Trump Won Popular Vote

Don’t forget trump’s base: angry white men with less than a high-school education.

6 Likes

To the extent that you can call it logic, here’s what Sanders (and Trump) means:

Even though the popular vote count shows Clinton got 2.8M more votes, we don’t count California, because it’s like a whole different country, or anyway … reasons. Once you take out those unamerican Californians, Trump actually had 1.4M more votes.

Lest you think I made this up just to poke fun at their Queeg-like, metal balls grinding, geometric logic:
https://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/its-official-clintons-popular-vote-win-came-entirely-from-california/

6 Likes

SHS could never exist in a perfect world.

5 Likes

In other news, the chocolate ration has just been raised to 20 grams! All hail Big Brother…I start to believe that this woman, like the man she works for, is incapable of telling the truth.

7 Likes

A Potemkin village.

7 Likes

“My job has never been easier.”
— Glen Kessler, head of fact checking at the Washington Post

9 Likes

Just Lyin* Sarah lyin* .

2 Likes

What the hell use is she to Trump if she can’t even pull off the simplest of lies?

2 Likes

To justify his attendance at a campaign rally the day of the Pittsburg shooting Trump claimed that the NY Stock Exchange opened a day after the 9/11attack to maintain normalcy and not give in to evil, too, but that didn’t make it true. Lying thru their teeth is the new normal.

8 Likes

Finally A FELLOW MAGA conservative on TPM. USUALLY they shadow BAN Non-libtards.

6 Likes

The press pool could learn from Joe Wilson (R-Sack of Shit)

3 Likes

My thoughts exactly - if he won a majority of the 63 million, were the rest of his votes the result of fraud? :laughing:

and @spencersmom

5 Likes

I suppose we’ll see next Tuesday.

1 Like

She doesn’t consider many of Hillary’s voters to be American. This is picking up on Trump’s claim that Hillary’s voters weren’t citizens but voted illegally. Apparently they’re still sticking with that lie.

2 Likes

Exactly. And thank you for pointing that out.

4 Likes

SHS is proof positive that there is NO god …

if there were …

she’d be struck down with cankers that wouldn’t pop —

1 Like

Sigh . . . You libtards with your politically correct doctrinaire crap such as facts and (eek!!) arithmetic. #MAGA!! (Make Americans Gag Always!!)

4 Likes

to which the WH would simply say “yeah … so what’s your point?”

2 Likes

… and reaching these conclusions by employing - gasp - “Arabic numerals” !

3 Likes

numbers matter …

The average size of a congressional district based on the 2010 Census apportionment population is roughly 711,000

A 2004 survey by the United States Election Assistance Commission reported an average voting precinct size in the United States of approximately 1,100 registered voters - doing the math then says that the “average” congressional district with 711,000 voters would have 646 precincts

Voter turnout in the United States fluctuates in national elections. In recent elections, about 60% of the voting eligible population votes during presidential election years, and about 40% votes during midterm elections.

So if a typical congressional district has 40% turnout that would be 284,400 ballots cast or roughly 440 per precinct.

A 50-50 split would be 142,200 / 142,200 … 220 /220 per precinct

A 2% victory margin - 51% to 49% would be 145,044 to 139,356 ( basically 225 to 215 at the precinct level – but it could be 224 – 216) - a margin of 5,688 in the total district or about 8.8 votes per precinct

In close contests – a 4 to 5 vote per precinct flip would be able to completely reverse a 2% lead

1 Like