I don’t know why they didn’t bring that up with some special elections in the red states. After all, it affects all consumers. It’s not a partisan issue.
Maybe the end game is to destroy union jobs at Whirlpool.
2 Likes
Dems could screw up the proverbial wet dream when it comes to campaigning and winning elections. I understand wanting to take the high road, and being transparent and honest in your claims and ads, but bringing a knife to a gunfight seldom ends well.
go to any store in AMERICA and learn just how many goods are made in CHINA…Its going to get interesting when XMAS rolls around and the price of toys, etc. ‘made in CHINA’ cost more than parents can afford, this will hit the MAGAers the hardest, they will either go into massive debt or do without…of course…DOTARD doesn’t realize that the rest of the world does business with CHINA…with no tariffs on goods OR farm products…this will work out really well for CANADA., SOUTH AMERICA, AUSTRALIA etc… TRUMPf is a ‘real-estate’ salesman…that’s all he knows and apparently he didn’t even do that well.
1 Like
CLINTON didn’t force any AMERICAN business to close down here and move their manufacturing to CHINA or other SE AISIAN countries…those companies went to where they could make the most profit…do you remember when WALMART opened they were going to sell 'made in AMERICA ’ goods. exclusively… hahahahaa.
9 Likes
Trump is a professional misogynist, racist and liar. That’s all Trump is.
2 Likes
am an old timey DEMOCRAT… am so disgusted with the current crop’s dumb’lets be nice’ nonsense…the bad thing about the ‘HIGH ROAD’ is that its so easy to fall off of…DEMOCRATS do have a tendency to bring a wet noodle to a slug -fest.
The 1% are gonna feel it as well. With the added pain, they will be pinched as the economy contracts.
Minor, but important correction in your Clinton rant. It actually was President George H.W. Bush’s NAFTA. Clinton just signed it, but Bush made it legal. All of this happened long before the 70’s when the gutting began and America decided to be a consumer rather than a builder of things. Sorry to fuck up your rant, but read some history before you jump in.
5 Likes
I’ve made this point at least once here. Republicans supplied all the ingredients for the NAFTA cake and baked it. Clinton merely applied the frosting they supplied…
1 Like
More than made up for by the already passed tax cuts… the proposed Capital Gains cut will be the icing on the cake… IMO they are VERY happy
Trump announces his tariffs and ordinary Americans are hurt. China responds with tariffs of their own. Ordinary Americans are hurt.
Would somebody explain just how Trump’s trade war is helping ordinary Americans.
Great recitation of the right wing talking points that have made several talking heads on hate radio rich. Sadly the rant is about as factual as anything Trump might say on a given day. While Clinton was a supporter, NAFTA was negotiated during the George H.W. Bush presidency. The gutting of the American industrial base came much earlier. The decline of the American economy was the work of a full generation of Republican business leaders who hated organized labor and knew how to get workers on the cheap. .
By the way we aren’t the first nation to adopt the financial/consumer strategy. The Netherlands tried the same thing back during the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th centuries. It lead to prosperity for about a generation and then collapse as the world financial capital moved to London and then New York.
2 Likes
The coolest thing about this article is that it has given me great pleasure to discover that Country Joe McDonald is not only still alive and kicking, but writing for my favorite political blog website. It can’t be too long now before he really pisses off Donald Trump.
1 Like
If China retaliates for the latest U.S. duties, Trump threatened Monday to add a further $267 billion in Chinese imports to the target list. That would raise the total affected by U.S. penalties to $517 billion — covering nearly everything China sells the United States.
Would I be remiss in assuming that the sole reason for the “nearly” qualifier is that the only Chinese goods which would be exempt from the tariffs are those which are imported by Ivanka’s businesses?
Gosh, you had me going there for a while, you sly dog.
1 Like
When did China become part of North America?
Automation is what gutted the US manufacturing sector, not globalization. Some jobs moved, yes. Far more of them… just stopped existing because we no longer needed 5 people to do what 1 machine can do better, more accurately, and faster, at higher volume.
1 Like
To be fair, my Galaxy SII is 6 years old. Most of the newer phones are bigger, and I find them a little unwieldy. I might upgrade soon, though.
The United States complains Chinese industry development plans [. . .] might erode American industrial leadership.
So maybe invest some money in actual improvements in infrastructure and education, you IDIOT.
1 Like