i’m sure dotard has called her worse…
I would’ve been sorely tempted to reply, “Yeah, whatever - answer the damn question.”
4 Likes
It’s not that difficult!
2 Likes
I mistakenly misread the headline as stating Nadler claims he didn’t mean to call Hope Hicks “Ms. Lewinski” which would have been understandable, as she was another famous Oval Office trouser steamer.
1 Like
i think nadler meant it in the common law sense. at least he didn’t ask her the last time she had sex with her bunk pal corey.
2 Likes
Binders full of crooks!
4 Likes
It would be spicier if Congressman Nadler was cheekier and referred to the former trouser steamer first as Iwanka, then as Ms. Lewandowski, Miss Teen USA, and then as Ms. Rob Porter and thereafter as Ms. Kushner… The list of possibilities is long here. Hopey Hicks had a lot of dopey dicks in her orbit like flies around feces.
But we are dealing with Democrats. They don’t even have contempt for criminals and traitors much less want any real justice.
2 Likes
Well… it could have been worse… He could have called her ‘Ms Lewinski’.
[edit]… credit where credit is due… The upstream posts got there first.
Offensive? Probably. Sexist? Yeah. Inappropriate? Yep. Funny? Hell yeah.
2 Likes
When you go up against Jerry you best be prepared to be called the wrong name. Never before have the enemies of democracy cowered in such fear.
Preoccupied or not, Nadller is out of touch.
Look at the bright side ,he could have called her “lil Marco or “sleepy Joe”…intentionally ,like the Don has a way of doing…”"
Sorry, but I expect better from politicians. “I missspoke” is the excuse of ignorant people.
He should have called her Ms. Russell or Ms. Jennings. That would have been fun. Good old “The Americans” fun.
It was a Sarah Sanders’ slip of the tongue. The kind that you say over and over again.
1 Like
Sure. So what?
Why is this a headline?