That’s pretty much what Nate Silver said in his blog late last week.
8 Likes
I love the advice of the San Diego Union Tribune:
This editorial board is torn about advising our Republican readers. We can’t endorse Trump for reasons we’ve documented repeatedly: belligerence, casual cruelty, incoherence on policy issues. We can’t recommend voters don’t vote at all because that’s a waste, and we can’t suggest voting for another candidate because it accomplishes nothing.So what do Republicans who don’t accept Trump’s style or substance — including all three Bushes, Mitt Romney, Ted Cruz, John Kasich, George Will and Charles Krauthammer — do?
…blah-blah-blah…
If you are voting in the GOP primary Tuesday, write in Ronald Reagan for president.
I think this qualifies as a non-endorsement.
9 Likes
You forgot the ‘evil’ Clinton Global Initiative.
2 Likes
You mean this one? Thanks, I missed it, on to reading…
1 Like
So was the Wall Street Journal, in case all the corporate shill screamers forgot. They endorsed BS over HRC
6 Likes
Yes. In short, Bernie may end up over-performing, but so what.
2 Likes
Also, you downticket corrupt corporatist money-laundering whores: vote for me as a superdelegate at the convention, because otherwise you’re proving what I just said about you.
10 Likes
Finished. My hunch (just a hunch) is a 6-8% spread, but at the end of the day, “so what” is right…
4 Likes
I assume you mean pro-Clinton.
1 Like
Yes.
3 Likes
Wait - you don’t mean the Rupert Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal, do you? Who knew Ole Rupe was a Bernie fan? 
6 Likes
But Clinton is not only more knowledgeable about domestic and international affairs than Sanders, but also more likely to achieve objectives they have in common. Her speech last week on foreign policy in San Diego – in which she skillfully skewered Trump for his ignorance and recklessness – was a reminder of the breadth of her understanding of international affairs. On domestic policy, her positions on issues such as healthcare and financial regulation are less utopian than what Sanders has proposed but also more realistic.
That sums up why I voted for her, and will help ensure she’s elected in November and her speech a couple days ago hit all the right notes (though admittedly leaving a lot of wiggle room on Isreal) and just confirmed she’s way out of Sanders’ league on handling international matters (Trump is a clown, so despite much of the rhetoric being aimed directly at him to knock him off his game, much of it applied to Sanders as well for his extremely limited and closed-minded approach to handling foregn policy).
16 Likes
In case anyone has lost count, here’s a list of Clinton’s newspaper endorsements. I’d list Bernie’s too, but I can’t seem to find any.
3 Likes
OT. Other than a really rich business man who isn’t Donald Trump, who the heck is Rocky de la Fuente?
1 Like
This list seems to be what Wikipedia has about Sanders. Not sure if it’s exhaustive.
1 Like
Is that a real name? I assumed it was a typo and they meant this:
If Hillary is beating Trappist Beer by a wide margin, she’s very, very good.
2 Likes
Hillary is now up by about 40.
5 Likes
Correct me if I’m wrong but “REPORTED UNITS 4 OF 335 FOR 1.19 %”* is the extent of the count thus far?
- Translated from “UNIDADES REPORTADAS 4 DE 335 PARA UN 1.19 %”
I believe so… I don’t know about the “units” (precincts?) but what few other pages (CNN) shows reporting 1% so that’s probably it.