By Andrew Blake - The Washington Times - Tuesday, November 14, 2017
The Department of Justice is treating President Trump’s frequent Twitter posts as official statements, attorneys for the government wrote in a new federal court filing.
Justice Department lawyers qualified the president’s tweets in an eight-page submission entered in D.C. federal court Monday after U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta asked the government earlier this month for clarification concerning Mr. Trump’s Twitter musings.
“The Court has asked, broadly, about the official status of the President’s tweets … asking the parties to ‘provide insight on … the President’s tweets and what they are, how official they are, are they statements of the White House and the President,’ ” Justice Department attorneys wrote Monday citing a Nov. 2 status conference hearing.
“In answer to the Court’s question, the government is treating the President’s statements to which plaintiffs point — whether by tweet, speech or interview — as official statements of the President of the United States,” the Justice Department responded.
I doubt Falwell and the evangelicals are joking. They are all about destroying America and replacing it with some sort of evangelical dystopia. For them “A Handmaiden’s Tail” is not a cautionary tail. It is a road map to what they perceive to be a glorious future.
Seriously, that’s just crazy talk! Who would say something like that, Chairman Xi? Maybe Putin and perhaps Kim Jong-un, but the AMERICAN President?! He doesn’t even socialize with those types and would CERTAINLY never ever admire the tactics they try to stay in office perpetually!
I love this. We need to keep this going & add to to. My sense of humor is lacking, & I can’t think of anything (that isn’t way over the line), but I know it when I see it. Great post.
i said this yesterday… it’s a huge mistake to not take this threat seriously. (the wapo headline refers to it as ‘bonus time’).
dotard is setting the stage for his refusal to accede power. and gearing up his base for violence.
Here’s a thought. How about the President of the United States start acting like the President of the United States and stop joking about stuff. Like I said, just a thought.
Does considering this fall into the “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” definition of impeachable offenses? It sure sounds like a High Crime to push for something as unconstitutional as this. But I suppose he’d have to do more than talk about it. He’d have to push for a vote in the Senate or something to that effect.