Explain to me again, Senator Cotton, why it’s Diane Feinstein who needs to be investigated?
I’m just a little lady, so use little words when you’re talking.
Just when you think they can’t get more awful…this is the reason they cowered behind Mitchell, they knew that they would be unable to control themselves and go after Ford with comments like this. And, they refuse to discuss her allegations while at the same time trying to destroy her character? Shameful behavior, which is why they don’t have any problem with Kavanaugh’s behavior towards women, they are happy destroying women’s lives to suit their own ends.
They are trying to outrace the news spilling out the pus-oozed sore that is the Senate Judiciary suppression of evidence and smearing of Swetnick.
Jeebus this is a mess.
Yeah, well, apparently, there’s a connection to PJ Media here…yes, the PJ Media that Whelan was working with…
Hmmm must be K’ s preference too.
This will help the GOPs standing with women…
Proceed.
Holy fuck how low will these immoral bastards go to confirm a man who is temperamentally unqualified for any judicial seat? Was just out walking with my dogs and the horrible thought crossed my mind that not many believed that such an unqualified boorish sexual pervert like dotard would stand a chance of becoming POTUS and now that same thing is happening again because the GOPers in charge of the process are so evil that they will push through a man who verbally attacked his opponents in committee testimony and threatened them with retribution when he is confirmed. Ignoring Kav’s testimony is a must for the GOPers so expect any number of other false and ugly rumors as distractions this week.
It’s so easy to withdraw this scumbag and move on. He’s lied under oath—no brainer. But no, throwing more shit at everyone but the asshole is always the next move. So the whole country goes farther down the sewer. They want a hot civil war, don’t they?
Wow. Classless and irrelevant, given that Swetnick never told him she liked sex with multiple guys while too drugged to give consent.
He probably didn’t mention that he was fired a week after getting the Emmy Award way back in 1995, that he suffered from depression in the early 1990s and was diagnosed with bipolar II disorder in 1995. It’s equally irrelevant to the credibility of her claims, so it seems like it should have been included if her alleged sexual history was.
[The info about his mental health conditions is something he voluntarily made public when he filed suit against the station that fired him. I’m not trying to out or shame him.]
Geez! It’s a good thing that we found out about her bizarre sexual preferences before she was nominated to the Supreme Court, or something.
Are you OKing the pitch forks and torches?
What is it about consent that these clowns think we don’t understand?
Bingo!
Sounds like the FBI needs to be interviewing farm animals in Iowa and Utah about the sexual proclivities of Grassley and Hatch…
And just when I thought this debate couldn’t get any more horrific…
Did anyone read this sad sack piece of shit’s letter? He claims he and Julie had no sexual contact only physical contact (?)and talking. Poor Emmy winning weatherman never had anyone hit on him, at a bar, and she didn’t have a drink in her hand so poor misguided man thought she was a hooker.
All this is a story from some dude that met Julie, and telling stories that he claims she told him, and nothing about her connection with Kavanaugh. Hell she was open and honest about her sexual past (didn’t mention rape, but who would) and this is what he smearing her with, with a little help from Hatch.
Please proceed, you foul old white men. Watch as the women you’re slut-shaming cut your shriveled balls off.
(sorry–at this point, the only appropriate response to the antics of Senate GOP is rage)
Someone should ask Chuck Grassley or Lindsey Graham to define slut shaming and then ask them how that’s appropriate for the gov’t to do to a private citizen, because that’s what this is.
Wow. The depravity of the GOP is bottemless.